ONCHAINBENCHMARKThe measurement standard for tokenized capital
IndicesDataRatingsMethodologyResearchReportsAboutLog inOpen Terminal ↗

OCB — Quality Rating · Tokenized treasuries

OUSG Quality Rating

OUSG (Ondo Finance) scores 64/100 on OnChain Benchmark's RWA Quality Rating — rated Developing (methodology v1.6, as of Oct 10, 2026).

Updated daily

Quality score

64

of 100 · Developing

Dimensions measured

4

of 4

Chains

2

with measured supply

Why OUSG scores 64

The biggest gap in OUSG's score is how concentrated its ownership is.

Each dimension's score is multiplied by its weight and summed: 63.50 of a possible 100, rounded to 64.

Composite

64 / 100

DimensionScoreWeightWhy it scored this
Holder Concentration

Ownership is concentrated: the top 10 holders across Ethereum and XRP Ledger own 97.4% of the free float on those chains.

Upgrade factorA wider holder base, with the top 10 owning 80% or less (9 of 25).

4 / 25
×1.3

Ownership is concentrated: the top 10 holders across Ethereum and XRP Ledger own 97.4% of the free float on those chains.

Upgrade factorA wider holder base, with the top 10 owning 80% or less (9 of 25).

Redemption Liquidity

Retail investors can redeem, with some friction; the top score also needs a deep onchain market alongside it.

Upgrade factorOnchain liquidity of at least 0.5% of supply (22 of 25).

19 / 25
×0.9

Retail investors can redeem, with some friction; the top score also needs a deep onchain market alongside it.

Upgrade factorOnchain liquidity of at least 0.5% of supply (22 of 25).

Disclosure Quality

Disclosure is current and regular, but it's voluntary rather than required by a regulator.

Upgrade factorHoldings reporting required by a regulator.

19 / 25
×0.4

Disclosure is current and regular, but it's voluntary rather than required by a regulator.

Upgrade factorHoldings reporting required by a regulator.

Structural Trust

Upgrades to the contract go through a timelock controlled by a 4-of-7 (or stricter) multisig.

24 / 25
×1.4

Upgrades to the contract go through a timelock controlled by a 4-of-7 (or stricter) multisig.

OCB Instrument

Rating history

OUSG’s quality rating, measured daily.
ONCHAIN
BENCHMARK
Source: OCB Quality Ratings · OUSG · onchainbenchmark.comRecomputed daily · Oct 10, 2026

Key facts

Issuer, rubric and methodology

Issuer
Ondo Finance
Asset class
Tokenized treasuries
Rubric
RWA Quality Rating
Methodology
v1.6
Last scored
Oct 10, 2026
What it is
Tokenized share of an actively-managed short-term U.S. Treasury fund.

Chains

Share of measured supply by chain

With measured supply

2

ChainContractShare of measured supply
XRP LedgerrHuiXXjH…000000Explorer ↗
58.0%
Ethereum0x1B19C1…Bbee92Explorer ↗
42.0%
Solanai7u4r16T…MwzxNcExplorer ↗Inactive — not counted

Supply scope: Excludes Polygon, Solana (not yet collected)

Evidence

Verified facts behind the rating

A sample of the verified facts behind OUSG’s score. The full diligence trail is in the terminal.

Facts shown

6

DimensionFactFindingVerifiedSource
Holder ConcentrationAddress exclusion

Individual wallet. public block-explorer labels the outgoing tx destination as "Ondo Finance: OUSG Token". Funded from another labeled Ondo address (0x06F38733...6f937ceE8) 2 years ago. 446 protocol transactions.

Two independent signals: label chain + funding provenance. Meets 90% threshold despite being an individual wallet.

Jun 1, 2026Etherscan address page — Ondo label chain on outgoing txns + funding provenance from labeled Ondo address.
Holder ConcentrationAddress exclusion

Multi-signature wallet infrastructure contract — contract source is publicly verified. Infrastructure contract; not a holder in any economic sense.

Jun 1, 2026Etherscan Contract tab — multi-signature wallet infrastructure source verified.
Holder ConcentrationAddress exclusion

Multi-signature wallet contract source is publicly verified. Protocol-controlled multi-signature wallet holding 16.37% of OUSG supply.

Jun 1, 2026Etherscan Contract tab — multi-signature wallet source verified.
Holder ConcentrationAddress exclusion

Multi-signature wallet contract source is publicly verified. Protocol-controlled multi-signature wallet holding 7.07% of OUSG supply.

Jun 1, 2026Etherscan Contract tab — multi-signature wallet source verified.
Disclosure QualityGovernance finding

The contract's admin is a multi-signature wallet 4-of-7 (a standard multi-signature wallet). 7 owners verified. Owners: 0x74a4C329...4C632173D, 0x189D409b...FE9457607, 0xECE6bC29...4737e5d0, 0x60F030d6...e2D95FB02, 0xaA1E4eef...A4B092f8e, 0x020679fF...7c1beD241, 0x6A95a204...E85594f46. 5 of 7 owners match USDY Safe — same Ondo keyholder set, separate Safe instance.

Jun 1, 2026Etherscan address page — Smart Account by Safe label. Owners tab + requiring 4 signatures.
Disclosure QualityAttestation source

Balance-sheet and account-statement PDFs embedded in Next.js RSC streaming payload. Machine-fetchable via RSC:1 header. 93 reports ingested over 6-month smoke test — 100% match rate.

May 31, 2026Etherscan — RSC-rendered reserve report page inspected

Cite this rating

Reference OUSG’s rating

Every rating carries its methodology version and a stable permalink, so a citation stays accurate after a later rescoring run.

Plain
OnChain Benchmark (2026). OUSG Quality Rating: 64/100 (Developing), as of Oct 10, 2026. Methodology v1.6. https://onchainbenchmark.com/instruments/ousg
Harvard
OnChain Benchmark (2026) 'OUSG Quality Rating', OnChain Benchmark, Developing, 64/100, methodology v1.6. Available at: https://onchainbenchmark.com/instruments/ousg (Accessed: Oct 11, 2026).
BibTeX
@misc{ocb_ousg_2026,
  author = {{OnChain Benchmark}},
  title = {{OUSG Quality Rating}},
  year = {2026},
  note = {64/100, Developing, methodology v1.6},
  url = {https://onchainbenchmark.com/instruments/ousg}
}
Plain · Harvard · BibTeX
Full diligence trail

The interactive terminal shows every verified fact behind OUSG's rating — the dimension-by-dimension breakdown, scoring history, outstanding supply, anomalies, and the complete evidence trail with sources.

Open in the terminal →Read the methodology →
OnChain Benchmark
HomeIndexRatingsMethodologySubmit for inclusion
Independent · Not investment advice