ONCHAINBENCHMARKThe measurement standard for tokenized capital
IndicesDataRatingsMethodologyResearchReportsAboutLog inOpen Terminal ↗
Reports/Tokenized Treasuries/OUSG
Tokenized TreasuriesEthereumXRP Ledger

One Afternoon, a Fifth of a Chain's Supply: US$46 Million of Ondo's OUSG Moved off Ethereum on June 22.

On June 22, two addresses sent 399,609 OUSG to a third address, which burned them about five hours later. That was roughly US$46 million, or 21% of the fund's supply on Ethereum, and every step settled in public onchain.

Key findings
  • →On June 22, 2026, about US$46 million of Ondo's OUSG moved off Ethereum in a single afternoon: 399,609 tokens, about 21% of the fund's supply on that chain. see data →
  • →Two addresses sent 92,395 and 307,213 OUSG to a third address at 14:15 and 14:16 UTC, and that address burned all 399,609 tokens at 19:29 UTC.
  • →In mid-July 2026, Ethereum carried about 46% of the OUSG supply read onchain and the XRP Ledger about 54%.
OnChain Benchmark ResearchPublished · Jul 13, 2026, 02:34 AM UTCData current · Jul 12, 2026

Revised October 5, 2026: figures corrected.

Tokenized Treasury funds hold short-dated government paper, settle onchain in minutes, and can be watched as they work. On June 22, one afternoon showed what that means for Ondo's OUSG.

At 14:15 UTC, one address sent 92,395 OUSG to a third address. A minute later, at 14:16 UTC, a second address sent it 307,213 more. At 19:29 UTC, the receiving address sent all 399,609 tokens to the burn address. At OUSG's net asset value of US$115.61 that day, the tokens were worth about US$46 million.

The burn shows up exactly in OUSG's Ethereum supply, which fell from 1,898,813 tokens that morning to 1,499,205 the next day. That is a 21% reduction, from about US$220 million to about US$173 million. The fund's net asset value held through the move, and every step is accounted for onchain.

Moved off Ethereum, one afternoonUS$46M399,609 OUSG, sent by two addresses and burned the same day
Share of Ethereum supply21%1,898,813 → 1,499,205 OUSG on Ethereum, Jun 22 to Jun 23
Net asset value, Jun 22US$115.61per OUSG token

Redeemed or moved, the ledger shows the size

A burn on Ethereum cannot tell us where the value went next. The tokens may have been redeemed for cash, or they may have moved to the XRP Ledger, the other chain OUSG runs on. We make no claim either way. What the ledger does show is the size and timing, to the token: a fifth of the fund's Ethereum supply left that chain in about five hours.

On our data date of July 12, OUSG's Ethereum supply was 1,605,439 tokens, worth US$185,989,058 at that day's net asset value. Our first XRP Ledger reading, the next morning, put 1,917,048 tokens there. In mid-July, Ethereum carried about 46% of the OUSG supply we read and the XRP Ledger about 54%.

What the ledger makes legible

In a traditional money-market fund, a 21% move in one share class would surface weeks later, if at all, inside an aggregate flow number. Here it settled in public in an afternoon, traceable address to address. That is the tokenized format's real advantage over the funds it modernizes: anyone can observe the flows as they happen, rather than reading about them in a quarterly disclosure.

The moveDirect onchain readTransfer-level, verified

On Jun 22, 2026, 0x9c0dc6… sent 92,395.43 OUSG (14:15 UTC) and 0xc78c58… sent 307,213.30 OUSG (14:16 UTC) to 0x72be8c…, which sent 399,608.73 OUSG to the zero address at 19:29 UTC. Ethereum supply fell from 1,898,813 to 1,499,205 tokens, a 21.0% reduction, about US$46M at OUSG's US$115.61 NAV. Whether the tokens were redeemed for cash or moved to another OUSG chain cannot be told from the burn alone, and no claim is made either way.

Verified Jul 12, 2026 · onchainbenchmark.com/instruments/ousg
Coverage scopeDisclosed limitEthereum and XRP Ledger

The Jun 22 move and supply figures are OUSG on Ethereum. Ethereum supply on Jul 12 was 1,605,439 tokens (US$185,989,058). Our first XRP Ledger reading, on Jul 13, was 1,917,048 tokens, so in mid-July Ethereum carried about 46% of the OUSG supply we read. None of these figures is Ondo's total AUM.

Coverage notes · onchainbenchmark.com/ratings
MethodologySupply is read directly from OUSG's Ethereum contract and from the XRP Ledger, the same public data any explorer shows, and the June 22 move is reconstructed from onchain transfer events. Dollar values use the fund's net asset value on the same day. No motive is inferred. Full methodology: onchainbenchmark.com/methodology. Live data: onchainbenchmark.com/instruments/ousg.
Questions & answers
What happened to OUSG on Ethereum on June 22, 2026?
Two addresses sent 399,609 OUSG to a third address, which burned them at 19:29 UTC. Ethereum supply fell from 1,898,813 to 1,499,205 tokens, a 21% reduction worth about US$46 million at the fund's US$115.61 net asset value. The burn alone does not show whether the tokens were redeemed for cash or moved to the XRP Ledger.
Why can you see large moves in tokenized Treasuries?
Tokenized Treasuries settle on public blockchains, so large transfers, mints and burns are visible onchain as they happen. About a fifth of a fund's supply on one chain moving in an afternoon can be observed in real time, by anyone.
Key facts
InstrumentOUSG ↗
IssuerOndo Finance
Asset classTokenized U.S. Treasuries
Ethereum supply (Jul 12)US$185,989,058
Ethereum share of OUSG supply (mid-Jul)~46%
More reports
Oct 9Tokenized Treasuries
Holders Redeemed 13.56% of Spiko's Euro T-Bill Fund in Two Weeks, and the Outflow Has Not Stopped
Oct 7Stablecoins
Zand’s Dirham Stablecoin Grew 4.88-Fold in 19 Days, to US$274.01 Million; on Ethereum, 98.96% Sits in Five Undivided Blocks
Oct 5Stablecoins
Hyperliquid Now Holds 58% More USDC Than Coinbase's Own Chain, and Most of Its Yield Goes to Hyperliquid.
Oct 5Stablecoins
USDe Grew 20.5% in September. Its Token Incentives Ended on September 30.
Oct 2Tokenized Treasuries
BlackRock’s BUIDL More Than Halved on Ethereum in September. On Solana, It Is Now 2.18 Times Larger.
Understand the ratings
What is an RWA quality rating?
How a tokenized asset is rated
The methodology
The full four-dimension rubric
Go deeper
Every number in this report is live in the terminal.
Full quality rating, evidence trail, and per-deployment supply history.
Open OUSG in Terminal ↗
OCB — 03

More from Reports

All reports →
Tokenized TreasuriesOct 9
Holders Redeemed 13.56% of Spiko's Euro T-Bill Fund in Two Weeks, and the Outflow Has Not Stopped
StablecoinsOct 7
Zand’s Dirham Stablecoin Grew 4.88-Fold in 19 Days, to US$274.01 Million; on Ethereum, 98.96% Sits in Five Undivided Blocks
StablecoinsOct 5
Hyperliquid Now Holds 58% More USDC Than Coinbase's Own Chain, and Most of Its Yield Goes to Hyperliquid.
StablecoinsOct 5
USDe Grew 20.5% in September. Its Token Incentives Ended on September 30.
Tokenized TreasuriesOct 2
BlackRock’s BUIDL More Than Halved on Ethereum in September. On Solana, It Is Now 2.18 Times Larger.
Market StructureOct 1
As Gold Slid More Than 11% From Its Peak, Tether Released 96,500 Ounces of Tokenized Gold — Its Biggest Month of 2026
OnChain Benchmark
HomeRatingsIndicesFlowsMethodologyReportsAboutEditorial policy
Independent · 2026

Subscribe to the Weekly Benchmark — what moved onchain this week, and what it means.

One email a week. Unsubscribe anytime.

Important disclosures

Nothing on this site or in the OnChain Benchmark service is investment, financial, legal, tax, or accounting advice, an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any security, token, or other instrument, or a recommendation, endorsement, or rating of suitability regarding any instrument, issuer, or transaction. Quality ratings, dimension scores, and index values are independent analytical opinions based on the data available to us at the time of computation; they are not statements of fact, guarantees of quality or safety, and not endorsements. Outputs are produced from public sources and third-party data and infrastructure outside our control — including RPC and node providers, indexers, oracle feeds, issuer attestations, auditor reports, and public regulatory filings — any of which may be delayed, unavailable, incomplete, incorrect, manipulated, or revised after the fact. Scores are computed periodically and may not reflect events occurring after the most recent computation. OnChain Benchmark does not warrant that any score, index, or evidence item is accurate, complete, reliable, current, or suitable for any purpose. You are solely responsible for any decision you make using the service, you should not rely on it as the sole basis for any investment, trading, custody, or counterparty decision, and you should conduct your own independent diligence and consult your own qualified professional advisors. To the maximum extent permitted by law, you assume all risk arising from your use of, or reliance on, the service. See our Terms of Service for the complete terms governing your use of the service.