ONCHAINBENCHMARKThe measurement standard for tokenized capital
IndicesDataRatingsMethodologyResearchReportsAboutLog inOpen Terminal ↗
Reports/Stablecoins/USDC
Stablecoins

Hyperliquid Now Holds 58% More USDC Than Coinbase's Own Chain, and Most of Its Yield Goes to Hyperliquid.

Five months after Coinbase and Circle agreed to hand Hyperliquid most of the yield on its USDC, the trading venue's chain holds US$6.93 billion of it. Base, the chain Coinbase built, holds US$4.38 billion. More of Circle's dollar now sits where the venue, not Circle and Coinbase, takes most of the yield.

Key findings
  • →At the October 4 close, Hyperliquid's chain held US$6.93 billion of USDC and Coinbase's Base held US$4.38 billion: 1.58 times as much, a lead of US$2.55 billion.
  • →Hyperliquid has held more USDC than Base on all 52 daily readings since August 13. Its USDC rose US$1.34 billion over that span; Base's rose US$0.13 billion.
  • →Under the May 2026 deal that made Coinbase Hyperliquid's USDC treasury deployer, Hyperliquid receives about 90% of the reserve income on that USDC, so more USDC now sits where the venue takes most of the yield than on Coinbase's own chain.
OnChain Benchmark ResearchPublished · Oct 5, 2026, 11:04 PM UTCData current · Oct 4, 2026

Hyperliquid's chain held US$6.93 billion of USDC at the October 4 close. Base, the chain Coinbase built to host everything onchain, held US$4.38 billion. The chain built around a single derivatives exchange now holds 1.58 times as much of Circle's dollar as Coinbase's own network, a lead of US$2.55 billion.

The size of the gap matters because of a deal struck in May. Coinbase became Hyperliquid's official treasury deployer for USDC, and under the terms Hyperliquid receives about 90% of the reserve income on the USDC its users hold. Interest on the reserves behind each USDC is how Circle and Coinbase earn on the dollar. On Base, that income stays with Circle and Coinbase. On Hyperliquid, most of it goes to the venue. The pool where the venue takes most of the yield is now the bigger one.

USDC on HyperliquidUS$6.93B9.30% of the US$74.53B we publish across 20 chains
USDC on BaseUS$4.38B5.87% of the same total
Days Hyperliquid led Base52 of 52Every daily reading since Aug 13

Third among USDC's chains, behind only Ethereum and Solana

Fig. 1

After Ethereum and Solana, the next-largest USDC chain is built around one exchange.

USDC supply at the October 4 close, in US dollars, for USDC's second-, third- and fourth-largest chains. Solana holds US$8.33 billion, Hyperliquid (green) US$6.93 billion and Base (blue) US$4.38 billion. Ethereum, the largest by far, is not shown.

ONCHAIN
BENCHMARK
USDC SUPPLY (US$) Solana Hyperliquid Base $0 $3B $6B $9B
Source: OCB , per-chain USDC totalSupply · onchainbenchmark.comOct 4, 2026 close (reads at about 23:02 UTC)

Hyperliquid is not closing in on Solana. Solana held US$8.33 billion on October 4 and stayed ahead on every day we read. Hyperliquid's rank is third, and it has held third on all 52 days. The comparison that has never wavered is the one with Base: Hyperliquid's smallest lead was US$1.34 billion, on August 13, the first day we read its chain.

The gap widened, then held

Fig. 2

Hyperliquid added US$1.34 billion of USDC while Base added US$0.13 billion.

Daily USDC supply on Hyperliquid (green), Base (blue) and Solana (grey), in US dollars, August 13 to October 4. Hyperliquid rose from US$5.59 billion to US$6.93 billion, most of it by September 22, and has held between US$6.87 billion and US$7.07 billion since September 21. Base moved from US$4.25 billion to US$4.38 billion. There is no reading for September 30.

ONCHAIN
BENCHMARK
USDC SUPPLY (US$) DATE $0 $2B $4B $6B $8B $9B Aug 13 Aug 18 Aug 23 Aug 28 Sep 2 Sep 7 Sep 12 Sep 17 Sep 22 Sep 27 Oct 2 $6.93B $4.38B $8.33B Hyperliquid Base Solana
Source: OCB , per-chain USDC totalSupply · onchainbenchmark.comAug 13 – Oct 4, 2026

Since August 13, Hyperliquid's USDC grew 24.0 percent. Base's grew 2.9 percent. The growth on Hyperliquid came in a run through late September and has since leveled off: from September 21 to October 4 it stayed between US$6.87 billion and US$7.07 billion. Base spent the same weeks between US$4.27 billion and US$4.38 billion. Neither chain is shrinking. One is where the new dollars went.

Why it matters: the terms travel

For a stablecoin issuer, distribution has usually meant getting the dollar onto as many chains as possible and keeping the interest. The Hyperliquid deal is a different shape: the venue that gathers the deposits takes most of the income. Analysts warned in May that other protocols may now demand similar terms. That warning carries more weight when the venue holding the shared pool is larger than the issuer's own chain. Any venue that gathers billions of a stablecoin now has a public precedent for asking for the yield.

For anyone tracking where dollar exposure sits, the map has an exchange on it. Hyperliquid's measured holdings are almost entirely USDC, so the venue's dollar base and Circle's distribution are tied together. The USDC on Hyperliquid is collateral on a venue built for leveraged trading, held under that venue's rules and economics. The open question is whether the next billions follow the trading to whichever venue offers depositors the most, or whether Base and the general-purpose chains win them back. Hyperliquid's flat line since late September is the first thing to watch: renewed growth would say the deal is still pulling dollars in; a plateau would say it has found its level.

The comparisonPer-chain supplyRead onchain

At the October 4 close, USDC on Hyperliquid was US$6.93 billion and on Base US$4.38 billion, a lead of US$2.55 billion (1.58 times). Hyperliquid led Base on all 52 daily readings from August 13 to October 4; its smallest lead was US$1.34 billion.

OnChain Benchmark per-chain totalSupply reads
The directionDaily series52 readings, one day missing

From August 13 to October 4, Hyperliquid's USDC rose US$1.34 billion (24.0%) and Base's US$0.13 billion (2.9%). Since September 21, Hyperliquid has held between US$6.87 billion and US$7.07 billion. There is no reading for September 30.

OnChain Benchmark per-chain totalSupply reads
What is not countedScopeDisclosed

Hyperliquid's figure is Circle-native USDC on its HyperEVM chain. A further US$394.15 million sat in Hyperliquid's bridge contract on Arbitrum at the same close; it is counted under Arbitrum, not Hyperliquid, so Hyperliquid's full USDC footprint is larger than shown. The US$74.53 billion total covers the 20 chains we publish; it is not all USDC.

OnChain Benchmark reads, Arbitrum block 511,747,772
MethodologyEach chain's figure is the totalSupply of Circle-native USDC on that chain, read onchain and valued at the published price. Daily figures use the last read of each UTC day; the October 4 figures come from reads at 23:00 to 23:02 UTC, before the 00:00 UTC close. Hyperliquid means its HyperEVM chain. Bridged USDC is not counted on the destination chain. Supply shows where USDC sits, not how much is trading.
Questions & answers
How much USDC is on Hyperliquid?
US$6.93 billion of Circle-native USDC on Hyperliquid's HyperEVM chain at the October 4, 2026 close, 9.30% of the US$74.53 billion OnChain Benchmark publishes across 20 chains. A further US$394.15 million sat in Hyperliquid's bridge contract on Arbitrum.
Is there more USDC on Hyperliquid than on Base?
Yes. At the October 4, 2026 close Hyperliquid held US$6.93 billion and Base US$4.38 billion. Hyperliquid has led Base on every daily reading since August 13, by at least US$1.34 billion.
Who earns the interest on USDC held on Hyperliquid?
Under the arrangement announced in May 2026, Coinbase is Hyperliquid's official USDC treasury deployer and Hyperliquid receives about 90% of the reserve income on that USDC, as reported by CoinDesk.
Key facts
USDC on Hyperliquid, Oct 4US$6.93B
USDC on Base, Oct 4US$4.38B
LeadUS$2.55B (1.58×)
Days Hyperliquid led52 of 52
Rank among USDC chains#3
More reports
Oct 5Stablecoins
USDe Grew 20.5% in September. Its Token Incentives Ended on September 30.
Oct 2Tokenized Treasuries
BlackRock’s BUIDL More Than Halved on Ethereum in September. On Solana, It Is Now 2.18 Times Larger.
Oct 1Market Structure
As Gold Slid More Than 11% From Its Peak, Tether Released 96,500 Ounces of Tokenized Gold — Its Biggest Month of 2026
Sep 30Stablecoins
PayPal Took PYUSD to 70 Markets. 88% of It Still Lives on Two Chains.
Sep 28Tokenized Treasuries
Tokenized Money Funds Cut Their Maturities 39% Before the Fed Hiked. Fidelity's US$463 Billion Government Fund Barely Moved.
Understand the ratings
What is an RWA quality rating?
How a tokenized asset is rated
The methodology
The full four-dimension rubric
Go deeper
Every number in this report is live in the terminal.
Full quality rating, evidence trail, and per-deployment supply history.
See methodology ↗
OCB — 03

More from Reports

All reports →
StablecoinsOct 5
USDe Grew 20.5% in September. Its Token Incentives Ended on September 30.
Tokenized TreasuriesOct 2
BlackRock’s BUIDL More Than Halved on Ethereum in September. On Solana, It Is Now 2.18 Times Larger.
Market StructureOct 1
As Gold Slid More Than 11% From Its Peak, Tether Released 96,500 Ounces of Tokenized Gold — Its Biggest Month of 2026
StablecoinsSep 30
PayPal Took PYUSD to 70 Markets. 88% of It Still Lives on Two Chains.
Tokenized TreasuriesSep 28
Tokenized Money Funds Cut Their Maturities 39% Before the Fed Hiked. Fidelity's US$463 Billion Government Fund Barely Moved.
Tokenized TreasuriesSep 25
Tokenized Treasuries Shrank US$1.2 Billion in the Month the Fed Hiked. One Wallet Redeemed US$1.1 Billion of It.
OnChain Benchmark
HomeRatingsIndicesFlowsMethodologyReportsAboutEditorial policy
Independent · 2026

Subscribe to the Weekly Benchmark — what moved onchain this week, and what it means.

One email a week. Unsubscribe anytime.

Important disclosures

Nothing on this site or in the OnChain Benchmark service is investment, financial, legal, tax, or accounting advice, an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any security, token, or other instrument, or a recommendation, endorsement, or rating of suitability regarding any instrument, issuer, or transaction. Quality ratings, dimension scores, and index values are independent analytical opinions based on the data available to us at the time of computation; they are not statements of fact, guarantees of quality or safety, and not endorsements. Outputs are produced from public sources and third-party data and infrastructure outside our control — including RPC and node providers, indexers, oracle feeds, issuer attestations, auditor reports, and public regulatory filings — any of which may be delayed, unavailable, incomplete, incorrect, manipulated, or revised after the fact. Scores are computed periodically and may not reflect events occurring after the most recent computation. OnChain Benchmark does not warrant that any score, index, or evidence item is accurate, complete, reliable, current, or suitable for any purpose. You are solely responsible for any decision you make using the service, you should not rely on it as the sole basis for any investment, trading, custody, or counterparty decision, and you should conduct your own independent diligence and consult your own qualified professional advisors. To the maximum extent permitted by law, you assume all risk arising from your use of, or reliance on, the service. See our Terms of Service for the complete terms governing your use of the service.