ONCHAINBENCHMARKThe measurement standard for tokenized capital
IndicesDataRatingsMethodologyResearchReportsLog inOpen Terminal ↗
Reports/Stablecoins/US$1.80B (65%)
Stablecoins

PayPal's Dollar Lives on Two Chains

PYUSD, PayPal's stablecoin, keeps 90% of its US$2.75 billion supply on just two chains — Ethereum and Solana. For a payments company with global reach, its onchain dollar is narrowly deployed, a striking contrast to the dozens of chains USDC and USDT span.

Key findings
  • →PYUSD, PayPal's stablecoin, keeps 90% of its US$2.75 billion supply on just two chains — Ethereum (65%) and Solana (25%) — with almost nothing elsewhere (Arbitrum 7%, Flow 3%). For a payments company with global reach, it is an unusually concentrated onchain footprint. see data →
  • →The split reflects a depth-over-breadth strategy: Ethereum for DeFi and collateral, Solana for consumer-scale throughput — rather than seeding a long tail of chains, the path USDC and USDT took across dozens of networks. PYUSD is mid-sized (eighth among the majors), so this is a deployment portrait, not a market-moving flow.
  • →Brand reach and chain reach are different things. A payments giant's entry into stablecoins is not an entry everywhere: PYUSD's onchain dollar lives in two places, chosen for what those chains do well. Whether it spreads as it scales — Visa has added PYUSD to its stablecoin settlement — is the map to watch. see data →
OnChain Benchmark ResearchDraft · PreviewData current · Aug 27, 2026

PayPal reaches hundreds of millions of users. Its stablecoin reaches two chains. PYUSD keeps 90% of its US$2.75 billion supply on Ethereum (65%) and Solana (25%) combined, with almost nothing anywhere else — Arbitrum holds 7%, Flow 3%, and the rest is a rounding error.

That is a narrow footprint for a payments company, and a deliberate one. USDC spans dozens of chains; USDT nearly as many. PayPal's dollar, by contrast, is concentrated where the deepest onchain liquidity already sits: Ethereum, the center of DeFi, and Solana, built for consumer-scale throughput. PYUSD is a mid-sized stablecoin — eighth among the majors at US$2.75 billion — so this is a portrait of a strategy, not a market-moving flow. But the strategy is legible in the map.

PYUSD on EthereumUS$1.80B65% — its largest chain
PYUSD on SolanaUS$0.69B25% — the other half of a two-chain dollar
PYUSD everywhere elseUS$0.26B10% — Arbitrum, Flow and a thin tail

Two chains, chosen for two jobs

The split is not random. Ethereum is where a dollar goes to be used as collateral and to settle across DeFi; Solana is where it goes to move cheaply at consumer scale. A payments issuer choosing those two, and little else, is choosing depth over breadth — placing its dollar where onchain demand already concentrates rather than seeding a long tail of chains that may or may not matter. Visa, for its part, has added PYUSD to its stablecoin settlement, a sign the token is being treated as payments infrastructure even as its onchain supply stays concentrated.

Fig 1 — PYUSD supply by chain, Aug 27, 2026

A two-chain dollar

PYUSD's US$2.75 billion supply by chain, in US$ billions. Ethereum and Solana (green) hold 90% between them; Arbitrum and Flow account for nearly all the rest. For a payments issuer, it is an unusually concentrated footprint. Figures are circulating PYUSD, reconciled to independent market value.

ONCHAIN
BENCHMARK
PYUSD SUPPLY (US$B) Ethereum Solana Arbitrum Flow $0.00 $0.50 $1.00 $1.50 $2.00
Source: OCB per-chain supply (chain breakdown) · onchainbenchmark.comas of Aug 27, 2026
See methodology →

Brand reach is not chain reach

It is tempting to read a payments giant's entry into stablecoins as an entry everywhere. PYUSD's map says otherwise: the company's onchain dollar lives in two places, chosen for what those chains do well. Whether that stays true is the thing to watch. If PYUSD is going to be a settlement asset at Visa scale, the question is whether it spreads to the chains that scale demands — or whether concentration on Ethereum and Solana is the more durable bet. A narrow map can be a weakness or a discipline; which one PYUSD is will show up as the supply either fans out or stays put.

The factPer-chain supply (ground truth)Reconciled to market value

PYUSD's US$2.75B supply is 65.3% on Ethereum (US$1.80B) and 24.9% on Solana (US$0.69B) — 90.2% on two chains — with Arbitrum (6.7%) and Flow (2.6%) accounting for nearly all the rest. Figures are circulating PYUSD, reconciled to independent market value.

Verified Aug 27, 2026 · onchainbenchmark.com/methodology
Whole-truth frameScale + scopeDisclosed

PYUSD is a mid-sized stablecoin — eighth of the majors at US$2.75B, well below USDC or USDT — so its narrow footprint is a deployment portrait, not a market-moving flow. 'Narrow' describes the map, not a judgment of PayPal. The figures are circulating supply, not bridged inventory.

Coverage notes · onchainbenchmark.com/methodology
MethodologySupply is the aggregate onchain supply of PYUSD, broken down by chain and reconciled to independent market value; a chain's figure is its circulating PYUSD, not bridged or unreleased inventory. Size rank is against the major dollar stablecoins we measure. The chains' functional descriptions are established market context, not measurements of ours. Full methodology: onchainbenchmark.com/methodology.
Questions & answers
How many chains is PayPal's PYUSD on?
PYUSD carries meaningful supply on only a few chains, and 90% of its US$2.75 billion sits on just two: Ethereum (65%) and Solana (25%). Arbitrum (7%) and Flow (3%) account for nearly all the rest. It is a concentrated footprint compared with USDC or USDT, which span dozens of chains.
Why is PYUSD on so few chains?
PayPal appears to have chosen depth over breadth — placing its dollar on Ethereum, the center of DeFi and collateral, and Solana, built for consumer-scale throughput, rather than seeding a long tail of chains. It is a deployment strategy: concentrate where onchain demand already is. PYUSD is a mid-sized stablecoin, so the choice is a strategy portrait, not a market-moving flow.
Key facts
PYUSD on EthereumUS$1.80B (65%)
PYUSD on SolanaUS$0.69B (25%)
On two chains combined90%
PYUSD total supplyUS$2.75B
Size rank#8 of majors
MethodPer-chain supply ↗
More reports
Aug 28Market Structure
Wall Street Raced to Tokenize Treasury Funds. It Left Tokenized Stocks — the Part Retail Actually Wants — to a Single Crypto Startup.
Aug 27Tokenized Treasuries
The Second-Biggest Tokenized Treasury Fund Lives on Binance's Chain, Not Ethereum
Aug 27Stablecoins
Ethereum Holds Less Than Half the Onchain Dollar — and Nearly a Third of It Lives on Tron
Aug 27Stablecoins
There's More USDC on Hyperliquid Than on Base
Aug 27Stablecoins
A Regulated Dollar Keeps More of Itself on OKX's Chain Than on Ethereum
Go deeper
Every number in this report is live in the terminal.
Full trust rating, evidence trail, and per-deployment supply history.
See methodology ↗
OCB — 03

More from Reports

All reports →
Market StructureAug 28
Wall Street Raced to Tokenize Treasury Funds. It Left Tokenized Stocks — the Part Retail Actually Wants — to a Single Crypto Startup.
Tokenized TreasuriesAug 27
The Second-Biggest Tokenized Treasury Fund Lives on Binance's Chain, Not Ethereum
StablecoinsAug 27
Ethereum Holds Less Than Half the Onchain Dollar — and Nearly a Third of It Lives on Tron
StablecoinsAug 27
There's More USDC on Hyperliquid Than on Base
StablecoinsAug 27
A Regulated Dollar Keeps More of Itself on OKX's Chain Than on Ethereum
StablecoinsAug 27
One Dollar, Three Chains: The Only Major Stablecoin Split Evenly
OnChain Benchmark
HomeRatingsIndicesFlowsMethodologyReportsAboutEditorial policy
Independent · 2026

Subscribe to the Weekly Benchmark — what moved onchain this week, and what it means.

One email a week. Unsubscribe anytime.

Important disclosures

Nothing on this site or in the OnChain Benchmark service is investment, financial, legal, tax, or accounting advice, an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any security, token, or other instrument, or a recommendation, endorsement, or rating of suitability regarding any instrument, issuer, or transaction. Trust ratings, dimension scores, and index values are independent analytical opinions based on the data available to us at the time of computation; they are not statements of fact, guarantees of quality or safety, and not endorsements. Outputs are produced from public sources and third-party data and infrastructure outside our control — including RPC and node providers, indexers, oracle feeds, issuer attestations, auditor reports, and public regulatory filings — any of which may be delayed, unavailable, incomplete, incorrect, manipulated, or revised after the fact. Scores are computed periodically and may not reflect events occurring after the most recent computation. OnChain Benchmark does not warrant that any score, index, or evidence item is accurate, complete, reliable, current, or suitable for any purpose. You are solely responsible for any decision you make using the service, you should not rely on it as the sole basis for any investment, trading, custody, or counterparty decision, and you should conduct your own independent diligence and consult your own qualified professional advisors. To the maximum extent permitted by law, you assume all risk arising from your use of, or reliance on, the service. See our Terms of Service for the complete terms governing your use of the service.