ONCHAINBENCHMARKThe measurement standard for tokenized capital
IndicesDataRatingsMethodologyResearchReportsAboutLog inOpen Terminal ↗
Reports/Stablecoins/US$1.67B (61.5%)
Stablecoins

PayPal Took PYUSD to 70 Markets. 88% of It Still Lives on Two Chains.

PayPal now offers PYUSD in 70 markets, and Ripple's RLUSD has closed to within US$186 million of it. Onchain, PayPal's dollar is far narrower than its distribution: 88% of its US$2.71 billion supply sits on Ethereum and Solana.

Key findings
  • →PYUSD keeps 88% of its US$2.71 billion supply on two chains: Ethereum (61.5%) and Solana (26.9%). Arbitrum holds most of the rest, and native issuance on Stellar, Polygon and X Layer is under one percent combined. see data →
  • →Ripple's RLUSD stood at US$2.52 billion on September 29, US$186 million short of PYUSD. The two payments-backed dollars are nearly the same size, and RLUSD's supply also sits almost entirely on two chains. see data →
  • →Since July 31, PYUSD's supply has been flat (under 1%) while RLUSD's grew 59%, cutting the gap from about US$1.1 billion to US$186 million. PayPal's consumer reach has not become onchain supply, while RLUSD, held by a small wholesale base, is the one growing.
OnChain Benchmark ResearchPublished · Sep 30, 2026, 11:00 PM UTCData current · Sep 29, 2026

Revised October 5, 2026: figures corrected.

PayPal has brought PYUSD to users across 70 markets. Its dollar onchain lives in two places. Of PYUSD's US$2.71 billion supply, 88% sits on Ethereum (61.5%) and Solana (26.9%). Arbitrum holds most of the rest.

The concentration matters more now than it did a month ago, because PYUSD is no longer comfortably ahead of its nearest challenger. Ripple's RLUSD stood at US$2.52 billion on September 29, US$186 million short of PYUSD, after crossing US$2.5 billion on a month of heavy issuance. RLUSD's supply also sits almost entirely on two chains, Ethereum and the XRP Ledger, and its holder base is wholesale. Two payments-backed dollars of almost identical size hold their supply in the same narrow way.

PYUSD on EthereumUS$1.67B61.5% — its largest chain
PYUSD on SolanaUS$0.73B26.9% — the second chain
PYUSD on ArbitrumUS$0.29B10.7% — most of the rest

Two chains, chosen for two jobs

The split follows function. Ethereum is where a dollar is posted as collateral and settled across DeFi; Solana is where it moves cheaply at consumer scale. An issuer that commits to those two, and little else, is choosing depth over breadth. Copies of PYUSD circulate on more networks through a bridged version, but those tokens are backed by PYUSD locked on the chains above and do not add supply. Visa has added PYUSD to its stablecoin settlement, treating the token as payments infrastructure even as its supply stays concentrated.

Fig 1 — PYUSD supply by chain, Sep 29, 2026

A two-chain dollar

PYUSD's US$2.71 billion supply by chain. Ethereum and Solana (green) hold 88% between them; Arbitrum holds most of the rest. Native issuance on Stellar, Polygon and X Layer is under one percent combined.

ONCHAIN
BENCHMARK
PYUSD SUPPLY (US$) Ethereum Solana Arbitrum Stellar Polygon X Layer $0 $500M $1B $2B $2B
Source: OCB per-chain supply · onchainbenchmark.comas of Sep 29, 2026
See methodology →

A flat dollar and a fast one

The two coins look alike on a map. They do not look alike over time. PYUSD's supply was about US$2.7 billion on both July 31 and September 29, a change of under 1%. Over the same two months RLUSD grew from US$1.59 billion to US$2.52 billion, a gain of US$936 million, or 59%. The gap between them narrowed from about US$1.1 billion to US$186 million.

PYUSD, Jul 31 → Sep 29Under 1%About US$2.7B on both dates
RLUSD, Jul 31 → Sep 29+59%US$1.59B → US$2.52B
Gap between themUS$186Mdown from about US$1.1B two months earlier

PYUSD's flat total also hides movement underneath it. Its Ethereum supply has fallen from US$1.81 billion in late August to US$1.67 billion. Arbitrum, the chain where it had grown fastest, is volatile: supply there fell from US$375 million to US$253 million in a single day on September 23 before partly recovering. Meanwhile, RLUSD added US$151 million in 30 days, more than four-fifths of the remaining gap.

Why it matters

The comparison tests a common assumption about stablecoins: that the issuer with the largest consumer network wins. PayPal has the network. Its 70-market expansion puts PYUSD in front of more users than almost any other dollar token can reach, yet onchain supply has not moved. RLUSD has no consumer app of comparable scale; it is held by a small, wholesale holder base and marketed to institutions. In this contest, the dollar with the narrower audience is the one gaining supply.

That has three implications. For PayPal, consumer distribution has not translated into onchain supply, and the next lever is likely institutional placement, not more markets. For Ripple, overtaking PYUSD would be a milestone built on a narrow holder base, which makes the supply faster to grow and faster to leave. For anyone ranking stablecoins, a supply league table between two tokens this concentrated measures a handful of balance sheets. The question for the next quarter is whether either issuer can turn its advantage, PayPal's reach or Ripple's institutional pull, into supply the other cannot match.

The factPer-chain supplyIndependently reconciled

PYUSD's US$2,706.75M supply is 61.5% on Ethereum (US$1,665.94M), 26.9% on Solana (US$727.97M), 10.7% on Arbitrum (US$288.67M), 0.4% on Stellar (US$11.78M), 0.4% on Polygon (US$10.39M) and 0.1% on X Layer (US$2.02M), as of Sep 29, 2026. Each EVM and Solana chain reconciles to its block explorer within 0.1%.

Verified Sep 30, 2026 · onchainbenchmark.com/methodology
Competitive contextRLUSD vs PYUSDMeasured

RLUSD supply was US$2,521.02M on Sep 29, 2026 across Ethereum and the XRP Ledger, US$185.73M below PYUSD. On Jul 31 RLUSD was US$1,585.50M and PYUSD about US$2.7B, a gap of about US$1.1B.

Verified Sep 30, 2026 · onchainbenchmark.com/methodology
MethodologySupply is the onchain total supply of native PYUSD on each chain, read directly from the token contracts on Ethereum, Solana, Arbitrum, Polygon and X Layer, and from the Stellar ledger, as of September 29, 2026, and priced at its market price of about US$1.0002. Native PYUSD on Stellar (about US$12 million) is included. Bridged PYUSD on other networks is backed by tokens locked on the chains measured and is not counted twice. Supply includes about US$351 million held in an issuer-tagged wallet on Ethereum; excluding it, Ethereum and Solana hold 87%. RLUSD is measured the same way on Ethereum and the XRP Ledger. Trend comparisons start on July 31, 2026, the first month-end on which Ethereum, Solana and Arbitrum were all measured; the smaller deployments, about 0.7% of supply on that date, are included on both dates. Full methodology: onchainbenchmark.com/methodology.
Questions & answers
How many chains is PayPal's PYUSD on?
PYUSD carries meaningful native supply on three chains: Ethereum (61.5%), Solana (26.9%) and Arbitrum (10.7%), as of September 29, 2026. Native issuance on Stellar, Polygon and X Layer is under one percent combined, and bridged copies on other networks are backed by PYUSD locked on those three chains.
Is RLUSD bigger than PYUSD?
Not yet. On September 29, 2026, PYUSD supply was US$2.71 billion and RLUSD's was US$2.52 billion, a gap of US$186 million.
Key facts
PYUSD on EthereumUS$1.67B (61.5%)
PYUSD on SolanaUS$0.73B (26.9%)
PYUSD on ArbitrumUS$0.29B (10.7%)
PYUSD total supplyUS$2.71B
RLUSD total supplyUS$2.52B
MethodPer-chain supply ↗
More reports
Oct 9Tokenized Treasuries
Holders Redeemed 13.56% of Spiko's Euro T-Bill Fund in Two Weeks, and the Outflow Has Not Stopped
Oct 7Stablecoins
Zand’s Dirham Stablecoin Grew 4.88-Fold in 19 Days, to US$274.01 Million; on Ethereum, 98.96% Sits in Five Undivided Blocks
Oct 5Stablecoins
Hyperliquid Now Holds 58% More USDC Than Coinbase's Own Chain, and Most of Its Yield Goes to Hyperliquid.
Oct 5Stablecoins
USDe Grew 20.5% in September. Its Token Incentives Ended on September 30.
Oct 2Tokenized Treasuries
BlackRock’s BUIDL More Than Halved on Ethereum in September. On Solana, It Is Now 2.18 Times Larger.
Understand the ratings
What is an RWA quality rating?
How a tokenized asset is rated
The methodology
The full four-dimension rubric
Go deeper
Every number in this report is live in the terminal.
Full quality rating, evidence trail, and per-deployment supply history.
See methodology ↗
OCB — 03

More from Reports

All reports →
Tokenized TreasuriesOct 9
Holders Redeemed 13.56% of Spiko's Euro T-Bill Fund in Two Weeks, and the Outflow Has Not Stopped
StablecoinsOct 7
Zand’s Dirham Stablecoin Grew 4.88-Fold in 19 Days, to US$274.01 Million; on Ethereum, 98.96% Sits in Five Undivided Blocks
StablecoinsOct 5
Hyperliquid Now Holds 58% More USDC Than Coinbase's Own Chain, and Most of Its Yield Goes to Hyperliquid.
StablecoinsOct 5
USDe Grew 20.5% in September. Its Token Incentives Ended on September 30.
Tokenized TreasuriesOct 2
BlackRock’s BUIDL More Than Halved on Ethereum in September. On Solana, It Is Now 2.18 Times Larger.
Market StructureOct 1
As Gold Slid More Than 11% From Its Peak, Tether Released 96,500 Ounces of Tokenized Gold — Its Biggest Month of 2026
OnChain Benchmark
HomeRatingsIndicesFlowsMethodologyReportsAboutEditorial policy
Independent · 2026

Subscribe to the Weekly Benchmark — what moved onchain this week, and what it means.

One email a week. Unsubscribe anytime.

Important disclosures

Nothing on this site or in the OnChain Benchmark service is investment, financial, legal, tax, or accounting advice, an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any security, token, or other instrument, or a recommendation, endorsement, or rating of suitability regarding any instrument, issuer, or transaction. Quality ratings, dimension scores, and index values are independent analytical opinions based on the data available to us at the time of computation; they are not statements of fact, guarantees of quality or safety, and not endorsements. Outputs are produced from public sources and third-party data and infrastructure outside our control — including RPC and node providers, indexers, oracle feeds, issuer attestations, auditor reports, and public regulatory filings — any of which may be delayed, unavailable, incomplete, incorrect, manipulated, or revised after the fact. Scores are computed periodically and may not reflect events occurring after the most recent computation. OnChain Benchmark does not warrant that any score, index, or evidence item is accurate, complete, reliable, current, or suitable for any purpose. You are solely responsible for any decision you make using the service, you should not rely on it as the sole basis for any investment, trading, custody, or counterparty decision, and you should conduct your own independent diligence and consult your own qualified professional advisors. To the maximum extent permitted by law, you assume all risk arising from your use of, or reliance on, the service. See our Terms of Service for the complete terms governing your use of the service.