ONCHAINBENCHMARKThe measurement standard for tokenized capital
IndicesDataRatingsMethodologyResearchReportsLog inOpen Terminal ↗
Reports/Tokenized Treasuries/13d / 13d
Tokenized Treasuries

Three Tokenized Cash Funds, Three Very Different Maturity Books

JPMorgan's, WisdomTree's and Franklin's tokenized government cash funds all trade at $1 and call themselves the same kind of onchain cash. Their SEC filings say otherwise: weighted-average maturity runs from 13 to 37 days, and weighted-average life — the final-maturity measure a headline WAM hides — reaches 113 days for Franklin, which holds agency notes maturing out to 2028. As these funds move into collateral and stablecoin reserves, that gap is what a lender's haircut is actually pricing.

Key findings
  • →Three tokenized government cash funds that all trade at $1 carry very different maturity books, per their Aug 31, 2026 SEC filings: JPMorgan (jltxx) runs a 13-day weighted-average maturity, WisdomTree (wtgxx) 19 days, Franklin (benji) 37 days — and on weighted-average life the spread is far wider, from 13 to 113 days. see data →
  • →The WAM–WAL gap is the hidden dimension: JPMorgan's is zero — only Treasury bills and repo, all maturing within about two weeks — while Franklin's 37-day WAM sits against a 113-day weighted-average life, a 76-day gap its filing traces to federal-agency notes (Federal Farm Credit, Federal Home Loan Banks) maturing as far out as 2027–2028, held for extra yield. WisdomTree's 20-day gap comes from a Treasury floating-rate note. Same label, three different reaches for yield.
  • →It matters because these funds are moving into the collateral layer of onchain finance — posted for leverage, held as stablecoin reserves — and collateral is judged by its worst day: a 13-day book turns to cash at par almost instantly, while a 113-day book may have to sell longer-dated paper into a stressed market to do the same. That difference is what a lender's haircut and a stablecoin's reserve choice are really pricing, whatever the $1 ticker says. see data →
OnChain Benchmark ResearchPublished · Sep 24, 2026, 04:40 PM UTCData current · Aug 31, 2026

A tokenized cash fund is supposed to be the boring part of the portfolio: a dollar that sits at a dollar, backed by short-term government debt, redeemable on demand. Three of the most credible ones — JPMorgan's, WisdomTree's and Franklin Templeton's onchain government money funds — all fit that description on the surface. All three hold a $1 share price; all three invest in U.S. government paper. But the portfolios behind them, disclosed in each fund's monthly filing, are built quite differently — and the difference is precisely the kind of thing that stops being academic the moment one of these funds is posted as collateral.

Two numbers describe how much interest-rate and maturity risk a cash fund carries. Weighted-average maturity, or WAM, measures how quickly the fund's holdings re-price as rates move — a low WAM means the fund resets fast and barely moves when rates do. Weighted-average life, or WAL, measures when those holdings actually come due, counting to final legal maturity. For a fund that owns only short Treasury bills, the two are nearly identical. When they diverge, it is a tell: the fund holds paper whose final maturity runs well past its next reset or call date — a longer-dated instrument a money fund is allowed to carry at a short WAM. The gap between WAM and WAL is where a fund's reach for yield shows up, and it is invisible in the one maturity number most summaries quote.

Fig 1 — Tokenized government cash funds by maturity, Aug 31, 2026Same product on the label, three different booksWeighted-average maturity (rate re-pricing) and weighted-average life (final maturity), from each fund's latest monthly SEC N-MFP filing. The WAM–WAL gap is the hidden-duration column.
FundNet assetsHoldingsWAMWALWAM–WAL gap
JPMorgan (jltxx)US$0.78B1613d13d0d
WisdomTree (wtgxx)US$1.02B919d39d20d
Franklin (benji)US$0.69B8237d113d76d
Source: OCB parse of each fund's SEC N-MFP filingas of Aug 31, 2026

JPMorgan runs it tight; Franklin runs it long

JPMorgan's onchain money fund sits at one end. Its WAM and WAL are both 13 days — no gap at all. Its filing shows a book of only Treasury bills and Treasury repo, everything maturing within about two weeks, no long tail. It is the closest thing to pure, short Treasury cash among the three: a fund built to move as little as possible and turn over fast. Franklin's onchain government fund sits at the other. Its WAM is 37 days, but its weighted-average life is 113 — a 76-day gap. The filing shows why: alongside its bills and repo, the fund holds federal-agency notes — Federal Farm Credit and Federal Home Loan Bank paper — with final maturities reaching into 2027 and 2028, carried at a short maturity but a long life. That is a deliberate reach for extra yield, and it is the reach that a 37-day headline does not show. WisdomTree's fund lands between the two at 19 and 39 days, its gap traced to a Treasury floating-rate note whose maturity outruns its reset. Three funds, three different ways to earn a little more on “cash” — legible only in the second maturity number.

Fig 2 — Weighted-average life, Aug 31, 2026

The maturity a headline WAM doesn't show

Weighted-average life — when each fund's holdings finally mature — in days, from the latest SEC N-MFP filings. JPMorgan's onchain fund (13 days) and Franklin's (113 days) sit nearly nine times apart on final maturity, even though their headline weighted-average maturities are only about 3x apart. WAL is the measure that surfaces the longer-dated agency and reset-bearing holdings a WAM figure understates.

ONCHAIN
BENCHMARK
WEIGHTED-AVERAGE LIFE (DAYS) JPMorgan (jltxx) WisdomTree (wtgxx) Franklin (benji) 0 30 60 90 120
Source: OCB parse of each fund's SEC N-MFP filing · onchainbenchmark.comas of Aug 31, 2026
See methodology →

Why the gap matters now

For most of their short history, tokenized cash funds were held the way you hold cash — to park a balance and earn a yield. The maturity of the underlying book was a detail for the fund's own risk committee, not something a holder had to price. That is changing fast. BlackRock's tokenized money fund is increasingly used as collateral for borrowing and leveraged trading, and issuers are filing new tokenized reserve vehicles built specifically to back stablecoins. In both roles the token stops being an end holding and becomes plumbing — something a lender advances against, or a stablecoin promises to redeem into. And plumbing is judged by what it does on its worst day.

On that worst day, the two maturity numbers stop being interchangeable. A book that matures in thirteen days can be turned into cash almost immediately at close to par; there is nothing to sell early. A book with a 113-day weighted-average life holds paper that, if the fund is forced to raise cash before it matures, has to be sold into the market at whatever price stress allows — and longer-dated agency notes move more, and trade thinner, than two-week Treasury bills exactly when everyone wants cash at once. That is what a lender is really setting when it decides how large a haircut to charge against tokenized collateral, and what a stablecoin issuer is really taking on when it parks reserves in one fund rather than another. The tokens look identical on a screen and move around a chain identically; the filings say they are not identical in the one moment that counts.

None of this makes the longer book wrong. Franklin's reach for agency yield is a legitimate design — more return on cash, well within what a government money fund may hold — and its investors are paid for it. The point is that the choice is now consequential to people who never see the filing: the borrower posting the token, the protocol accepting it, the holder of a stablecoin it backs. As tokenized cash scales from a few billion into the collateral layer of onchain finance, the market will have to price these funds by their books, not their tickers — the way repo desks already price traditional money-fund collateral. There is even a hint of where that leads: across the summer all three funds shortened their books as rates re-priced — JPMorgan's WAM fell from 26 days to 13, WisdomTree's from 43 to 19, Franklin's from 53 to 37 — converging toward the short end from very different starts. The open question is whether the funds that win the most collateral use get pulled all the way toward the tightest, most JPMorgan-like books, because the shorter the maturity, the less there is to underwrite — or whether yield keeps a longer book like Franklin's in the mix, and the market simply learns to charge it a wider haircut. Either way, the number that decides it is the one the label leaves out.

The factPortfolio maturity (SEC filing)Re-derived from EDGAR

As of their Aug 31, 2026 N-MFP filings: JPMorgan (jltxx) WAM 13d / WAL 13d, net US$0.78B, 16 holdings; WisdomTree (wtgxx) WAM 19d / WAL 39d, net US$1.02B, 9 holdings; Franklin (benji) WAM 37d / WAL 113d, net US$0.69B, 82 holdings. WAM and WAL are the funds' own reported figures, parsed from each primary SEC filing and re-read against EDGAR (Franklin's 113-day WAL confirmed in the filing).

SEC N-MFP filings (EDGAR) · onchainbenchmark.com/methodology
What WAL addsHow to read itDefinitional

WAM weights each holding by the time to its next interest-rate reset or call; WAL weights by the time to final legal maturity. A fund of short Treasury bills has WAM ≈ WAL. A wide gap means the fund holds paper — here, federal-agency notes maturing in 2027–2028 (Franklin) or a Treasury floating-rate note (WisdomTree) — whose final maturity runs well past its short WAM. Franklin's 76-day gap is that reach for yield; JPMorgan's zero gap (Treasury bills and repo only) is its absence.

Methodology · onchainbenchmark.com/methodology
CoverageScopeDisclosed

A named comparison of the three tokenized government money-market funds for which we parse a mapped SEC N-MFP filing (JPMorgan, WisdomTree, Franklin). Not a claim about every tokenized cash fund: other issuers (e.g. Fidelity's digital money funds) file but are not yet mapped to our instrument set. Figures are as of the Aug 31, 2026 filings — the latest monthly filings available; funds file with a lag. Portfolio composition percentages are not published here.

Coverage notes · onchainbenchmark.com/methodology
MethodologyWeighted-average maturity (WAM) and weighted-average life (WAL) are each fund's own reported figures, taken from its most recent monthly SEC N-MFP filing and parsed from the primary filing document; the figures here are as of the Aug 31, 2026 filings and were re-read against the SEC source. WAM weights holdings by time to the next interest-rate reset; WAL by time to final maturity. Net assets and holding counts are from the same filings. The comparison set is the tokenized government money-market funds for which we parse a mapped filing; portfolio-composition percentages are not reported.
Questions & answers
Are all tokenized money-market funds the same under the hood?
No. As of their August 31, 2026 SEC filings, three of the leading tokenized government cash funds show a wide range: JPMorgan's onchain fund has a 13-day weighted-average maturity and 13-day weighted-average life; WisdomTree's has a 19-day WAM and 39-day WAL; Franklin's has a 37-day WAM and a 113-day WAL. All hold a $1 share price, but their maturity books differ substantially.
What is the difference between WAM and WAL, and why does the gap matter?
Weighted-average maturity (WAM) measures how quickly a fund's holdings re-price as interest rates move; weighted-average life (WAL) measures when those holdings finally mature. For a fund of short Treasury bills the two are nearly equal. A large gap — Franklin's is 76 days — means the fund holds longer-dated paper whose final maturity runs well past its short WAM: in Franklin's case, federal-agency notes maturing as far out as 2027–2028, held for extra yield. It adds final-maturity risk a headline WAM figure does not show.
Where do these numbers come from?
From each fund's monthly N-MFP filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, parsed from the primary filing document and re-read against the SEC's EDGAR system. The figures are as of the August 31, 2026 filings, the most recent available; money-market funds file monthly, with a lag.
Key facts
JPMorgan (jltxx) WAM / WAL13d / 13d
WisdomTree (wtgxx) WAM / WAL19d / 39d
Franklin (benji) WAM / WAL37d / 113d
As ofAug 31, 2026 filings
SourceSEC N-MFP filings ↗
More reports
Sep 23Stablecoins
One Dollar, Three Chains: The Only Major Stablecoin Split Evenly
Sep 22Market Structure
There's US$5.7 Billion of Tokenized Gold. One Token Holds the Top Grade.
Sep 22Stablecoins
USDT Owns the Dollars on Ethereum. It Also Owns the Wallets.
Sep 18Stablecoins
Ripple Wants RLUSD to Be a Treasury Dollar. Just 12,458 Wallets Hold It.
Sep 16Market Structure
Take Away USDC and USDT, and These US$107B Chain Markets Shrink to US$1.9B
Understand the ratings
What is an RWA quality rating?
How a tokenized asset is rated
The methodology
The full four-dimension rubric
Go deeper
Every number in this report is live in the terminal.
Full quality rating, evidence trail, and per-deployment supply history.
See methodology ↗
OCB — 03

More from Reports

All reports →
StablecoinsSep 23
One Dollar, Three Chains: The Only Major Stablecoin Split Evenly
Market StructureSep 22
There's US$5.7 Billion of Tokenized Gold. One Token Holds the Top Grade.
StablecoinsSep 22
USDT Owns the Dollars on Ethereum. It Also Owns the Wallets.
StablecoinsSep 18
Ripple Wants RLUSD to Be a Treasury Dollar. Just 12,458 Wallets Hold It.
Market StructureSep 16
Take Away USDC and USDT, and These US$107B Chain Markets Shrink to US$1.9B
StablecoinsSep 15
The Onchain Dollar Isn't Multichain — 85% of It Sits on Just Two Chains
OnChain Benchmark
HomeRatingsIndicesFlowsMethodologyReportsAboutEditorial policy
Independent · 2026

Subscribe to the Weekly Benchmark — what moved onchain this week, and what it means.

One email a week. Unsubscribe anytime.

Important disclosures

Nothing on this site or in the OnChain Benchmark service is investment, financial, legal, tax, or accounting advice, an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any security, token, or other instrument, or a recommendation, endorsement, or rating of suitability regarding any instrument, issuer, or transaction. Quality ratings, dimension scores, and index values are independent analytical opinions based on the data available to us at the time of computation; they are not statements of fact, guarantees of quality or safety, and not endorsements. Outputs are produced from public sources and third-party data and infrastructure outside our control — including RPC and node providers, indexers, oracle feeds, issuer attestations, auditor reports, and public regulatory filings — any of which may be delayed, unavailable, incomplete, incorrect, manipulated, or revised after the fact. Scores are computed periodically and may not reflect events occurring after the most recent computation. OnChain Benchmark does not warrant that any score, index, or evidence item is accurate, complete, reliable, current, or suitable for any purpose. You are solely responsible for any decision you make using the service, you should not rely on it as the sole basis for any investment, trading, custody, or counterparty decision, and you should conduct your own independent diligence and consult your own qualified professional advisors. To the maximum extent permitted by law, you assume all risk arising from your use of, or reliance on, the service. See our Terms of Service for the complete terms governing your use of the service.