ONCHAINBENCHMARKThe measurement standard for tokenized capital
IndexesResearchReportsCoverageLog inOpen Terminal ↗
Reports/Market Structure/Tokenized gold — issuance models
Market StructureEthereum

Two Tokenized Golds, Nearly the Same Size — but One Trades a Fixed Block and the Other You Mint and Redeem Like a Fund.

Tether Gold and PAX Gold look like the same product: tokenized gold, roughly two billion dollars each, fully backed. On-chain, they behave in opposite ways. Tether Gold's Ethereum supply has sat unchanged at 612,824 ounces for two months — no new issuance, no redemptions — while the tokens themselves trade briskly. PAX Gold's supply drifted down about 4% over the same weeks as gold was minted and redeemed on demand. It's a distinction no single AUM figure captures — and it changes what you're actually holding.

Key findings
  • →The two largest tokenized gold tokens run opposite issuance models: Tether Gold (XAUT) is a fixed pre-minted block, while PAX Gold (PAXG) is minted and redeemed on demand like an open-end fund (July 2026).
  • →Tether Gold's Ethereum supply held unchanged at 612,824 circulating ounces (~US$2.5B) for eight weeks — no new issuance, no redemptions — even as the token traded actively; a further 94,923 ounces (~US$384M, about 13% of what it has minted) sit in a disclosed non-circulating reserve the circulating figure excludes.
  • →PAX Gold's supply fell about 4% over the same eight weeks (464,217 to 444,865 ounces) as gold was minted and redeemed on demand — supply that moves with subscriptions and redemptions.
OnChain Benchmark ResearchPublished · Jul 24, 2026, 09:04 PM UTCData current · Jul 24, 2026

Tether Gold and PAX Gold are the two largest tokenized gold tokens, and on paper they are the same thing: a token, each ounce backed by a real ounce of allocated gold, worth roughly two billion dollars. Pull either one up on any data tracker and you get a single number — its size — and the two look like interchangeable versions of the same idea. Read what the tokens actually do on-chain, and they turn out to be built on opposite designs.

Start with the one that doesn't move. Tether Gold's supply on Ethereum — where about 98% of it lives — has been fixed at 612,824 ounces for two months: not a single new token minted, not one redeemed, from early June through late July. Yet the token is anything but idle — it changed hands tens of thousands of times over those same weeks. The supply is frozen; the trading isn't. That is the signature of a fixed block: a fixed pool of tokens that the market buys and sells among itself, without the issuer creating or destroying any along the way.

Part of that fixed block was never in public hands to begin with. About 94,923 ounces — roughly US$384 million, or 13% of what Tether Gold has minted— sits in a Tether reserve wallet, minted but not circulating. It's a disclosed choice, and it matches Tether's own reporting (707,747 ounces custodied against 612,824 circulating). We publish the circulating figure — the reserve is inventory held back from a one-time mint, not gold in the market. That reserve is the tell: you pre-mint a block, hold some back, and release it as demand arrives, rather than minting fresh tokens every time someone buys.

Tether Gold — Ethereum supply, June to late July612,824 ozunchanged: no new issuance, no redemptions — a fixed block that trades
Held in reserve, minted not circulating≈US$384M94,923 oz / ~13% of minted; disclosed, matches Tether's own figures
PAX Gold — supply change, same window−4.2%464,217 → 444,865 oz, as gold was minted and redeemed on demand

The other one breathes

PAX Gold works the opposite way. Over the same two months its supply didn't hold flat — it drifted down about 4%, from 464,217 to 444,865 ounces, in a series of small steps rather than one big move. That is what supply looks like when a token is minted and redeemed on demand: as holders subscribe, new tokens are created; as they redeem for gold or cash, tokens are destroyed and the supply falls. PAX Gold's supply breatheswith the flow of money in and out — the way an open-end fund's share count does. Tether Gold's doesn't, because its block is already minted.

Neither design is better; they are answers to different questions. A fixed block is simple and predictable — the supply is what it is, and the issuer isn't minting into every rally. A mint-on-demand model tracks real subscriptions and redemptions, so the supply itself is a live read on whether money is coming in or going out. What matters is that they are not the same product, even though they carry the same label and sit next to each other on every leaderboard.

Why the size number hides it

None of this is visible in the figure everyone quotes. Ask any tracker for the size of these tokens and you get one number apiece — an AUM total that treats a fixed, pre-minted block and a mint-on-demand fund as the same kind of thing. It takes reading the tokens' actual on-chain behavior — whether supply moves, whether new tokens are being issued or redeemed, and what sits in the reserve wallet — to see that one is closer to a fixed commodity token and the other closer to a fund. That difference changes practical things: how each responds when demand surges, whether you exit by trading or by redeeming, and what the headline “supply” number is even measuring.

It also fits a pattern this category keeps showing. Tether Gold and PAX Gold are the mature, broadly-held end of tokenized gold; the newer entrants look different again — Matrixdock's XAUM, a fraction of their size, is spread across four chains with nearly all of it in a handful of wallets. As with the funds we've measured before, the tokens that have been around longest have settled into clear, legible shapes — and the shape, it turns out, isn't one shape. Even within “tokenized gold,” there is more than one way to put an ounce on-chain.

Fixed vs. flexing supplyDirect on-chain readGround-truth totalSupply

Tether Gold's Ethereum totalSupply read one value — 707,747 oz minted, 612,824 circulating after the reserve — across every reading from Jun 2 to Jul 24, 2026 (no change). PAX Gold's totalSupply fell from 464,217 to 444,865 oz over the same window, in gradual steps. Supply figures are read directly from each contract.

Verified Jul 24, 2026 · onchainbenchmark.com/instruments/xaut
Circulating vs. mintedDisclosed methodReserve wallet identified

Tether Gold mints 707,747 oz on-chain but holds 94,923 oz (~US$384M, ~13%) in a non-circulating reserve wallet; we publish the circulating figure (612,824 oz), matching Tether's own gold.tether.to reporting. PAX Gold's minted supply is its circulating supply. Both tokens have large flagged holders (Tether's reserve; Paxos/exchange custody for PAX Gold) — the difference is the reserve's role, not its presence.

Method · onchainbenchmark.com/methodology
ScopeDisclosed limitEthereum, per token

The 'fixed supply' finding is Tether Gold's Ethereum deployment (~98% of the token). Its smaller BNB Chain leg (~US$52M) does move and is newly measured. PAX Gold is single-chain (Ethereum). Figures are each token's on-chain supply, read directly; no issuer AUM is assumed. Mint/redeem activity is described directionally from on-chain events, not published as an exact transaction count.

Coverage · onchainbenchmark.com/research/coverage
MethodologySupply is read directly from each token's contract — the same public data any block explorer shows — and tracked daily over the eight-week window. Tether Gold's circulating figure subtracts its declared non-circulating reserve wallet from minted supply; PAX Gold's minted supply is its circulating supply. Whether supply changed, and in which direction, is a ground-truth read; the mint-and-redeem characterization describes on-chain issuance behavior directionally and does not publish an exact transaction count. No token is rated better or worse — this maps two legitimate issuance designs rather than judging them. Full methodology: onchainbenchmark.com/methodology.
Questions & answers
How do Tether Gold and PAX Gold differ?
They are the two largest tokenized gold tokens and both hold allocated gold, but they use opposite issuance models. Tether Gold (XAUT) is a fixed pre-minted block: its Ethereum supply held unchanged at 612,824 circulating ounces for eight weeks in mid-2026, with no new tokens minted or redeemed, even though the token traded actively. PAX Gold (PAXG) is minted and redeemed on demand like an open-end fund, so its supply moves with subscriptions and redemptions — it fell about 4% over the same period.
Why is Tether Gold's circulating supply lower than the amount minted?
Tether Gold has minted 707,747 ounces on-chain, but about 94,923 of them — roughly US$384 million, or 13% — sit in a Tether reserve wallet that is minted but not circulating. The circulating figure of 612,824 ounces excludes that reserve, matching Tether's own reporting. It is a disclosed supply-management choice, not a discrepancy.
Which tokenized gold token is bigger?
Tether Gold is larger. On its circulating supply it is worth roughly US$2.5 billion, versus about US$1.8 billion for PAX Gold, as of July 2026. Excluding Tether Gold's non-circulating reserve does not change the ranking.
Does a fixed supply mean a tokenized gold token is inactive?
No. Tether Gold's supply was unchanged for eight weeks because no new tokens were being minted or redeemed, but the existing tokens traded heavily throughout — a fixed pool of tokens can change hands constantly. A fixed supply reflects the issuance model, not the level of trading activity.
Key facts
SubjectTokenized gold — issuance models
Tether Gold (XAUT)≈US$2.5B · 2 chains ↗
— Ethereum supply612,824 oz, fixed 8 wks
— Held in reserve≈US$384M (94,923 oz)
PAX Gold (PAXG)≈US$1.8B · 1 chain · −4.2% ↗
More reports
Jul 22Tokenized Treasuries
Tokenized Treasuries Are Getting a Trading Venue. The Assets Are Held So Tightly There's Barely Anyone to Trade With.
Jul 20Market Structure
US$1.8 Billion of Tokenized Gold Sits on One Contract While the Big Treasury Funds Sprawl Across Chains — and the Reason Isn't Gold.
Jul 17Tokenized Treasuries
US$2.6 Billion of a Circle Treasury Fund Sits on One Exchange's Chain — and That's How the Category Is Now Won
Jul 15Tokenized Treasuries
Spiko's EU T-Bill Fund Is Registered on Ethereum. US$18M of Its US$994M Lives There.
Jul 14Tokenized Treasuries
US$3.8 Billion of Tokenized-Treasury Capital Has Left the Chain It Was Issued On
Jul 13Tokenized Treasuries
US$1.86 Billion of BlackRock's Flagship Tokenized Fund Sits off Ethereum — the Chain It's Supposed to Prove
Jul 12Tokenized Treasuries
One Afternoon, One Wallet, a Quarter of a Chain's Supply: What On-Chain Measurement Shows About Tokenized Treasuries.
Go deeper
Every number in this report is live in the terminal.
Full trust rating, evidence trail, and per-deployment supply history.
Open Tether Gold in Terminal ↗
OCB — 03

More from Reports

All reports →
Tokenized TreasuriesJul 22
Tokenized Treasuries Are Getting a Trading Venue. The Assets Are Held So Tightly There's Barely Anyone to Trade With.
Market StructureJul 20
US$1.8 Billion of Tokenized Gold Sits on One Contract While the Big Treasury Funds Sprawl Across Chains — and the Reason Isn't Gold.
Tokenized TreasuriesJul 17
US$2.6 Billion of a Circle Treasury Fund Sits on One Exchange's Chain — and That's How the Category Is Now Won
Tokenized TreasuriesJul 15
Spiko's EU T-Bill Fund Is Registered on Ethereum. US$18M of Its US$994M Lives There.
Tokenized TreasuriesJul 14
US$3.8 Billion of Tokenized-Treasury Capital Has Left the Chain It Was Issued On
Tokenized TreasuriesJul 13
US$1.86 Billion of BlackRock's Flagship Tokenized Fund Sits off Ethereum — the Chain It's Supposed to Prove
Tokenized TreasuriesJul 12
One Afternoon, One Wallet, a Quarter of a Chain's Supply: What On-Chain Measurement Shows About Tokenized Treasuries.
OnChain Benchmark
HomeIndexesReportsMethodologyCoverageAboutEditorial policy
Independent · 2026

Subscribe to the Weekly Benchmark — what moved on-chain this week, and what it means.

One email a week. Unsubscribe anytime.

Important disclosures

Nothing on this site or in the OnChain Benchmark service is investment, financial, legal, tax, or accounting advice, an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any security, token, or other instrument, or a recommendation, endorsement, or rating of suitability regarding any instrument, issuer, or transaction. Trust ratings, dimension scores, and index values are independent analytical opinions based on the data available to us at the time of computation; they are not statements of fact, guarantees of quality or safety, and not endorsements. Outputs are produced from public sources and third-party data and infrastructure outside our control — including RPC and node providers, indexers, oracle feeds, issuer attestations, auditor reports, and public regulatory filings — any of which may be delayed, unavailable, incomplete, incorrect, manipulated, or revised after the fact. Scores are computed periodically and may not reflect events occurring after the most recent computation. OnChain Benchmark does not warrant that any score, index, or evidence item is accurate, complete, reliable, current, or suitable for any purpose. You are solely responsible for any decision you make using the service, you should not rely on it as the sole basis for any investment, trading, custody, or counterparty decision, and you should conduct your own independent diligence and consult your own qualified professional advisors. To the maximum extent permitted by law, you assume all risk arising from your use of, or reliance on, the service. See our Terms of Service for the complete terms governing your use of the service.