ONCHAINBENCHMARKThe measurement standard for tokenized capital
IndicesDataRatingsMethodologyResearchReportsAboutLog inOpen Terminal ↗
Reports/Stablecoins/USD1
StablecoinsEthereumBNB ChainSolana

USD1 Shrank US$385.03 Million in Nine Days as World Liberty Prepares to Take Over Its Issuance

World Liberty Financial plans to bring USD1's issuance in-house from BitGo under a federal trust charter that is now being challenged in court. In the nine days to the October 15 close, redemptions on Ethereum and BNB Chain cut the token's supply by 8.71%, most of it through two channels.

Key findings
  • →USD1 supply fell US$385.03 million (8.71%) from the October 6 close to the October 15 close, to US$4.04 billion on Ethereum, BNB Chain and Solana, while World Liberty prepares to take over issuance from BitGo. see data →
  • →Redemptions on Ethereum (−US$184.60 million, 63 burns) and BNB Chain (−US$200.43 million, 12 burns) account for the decline. Solana did not change, and no other network issued an offsetting amount.
  • →The redemptions were concentrated. On BNB Chain, US$200.00 million of the US$200.50 million sent for redemption originated at one address, in lots of US$30 million to US$50 million.
  • →USD1 is no longer split in thirds. BNB Chain's share of three-chain supply fell below 30% at the October 15 close, and Solana drew level with Ethereum. see data →
OnChain Benchmark ResearchPublished · Oct 16, 2026, 10:15 PM UTCData current · Oct 15, 2026

USD1, the dollar token issued for World Liberty Financial, is about to change issuers. World Liberty's trust company won conditional approval from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency in August and plans to take over issuance and custody of USD1 from BitGo, under a type of charter that a community-bank trade group has asked a federal court to rein in. The supply it would inherit has just shown how fast it can shrink: in the nine days to the October 15 close, US$385.03 million of USD1 was redeemed, 8.71 percent of the token on its three main chains.

USD1 was used to settle MGX's US$2 billion investment in Binance, and World Liberty launched it as an institutional-ready stablecoin. October shows how concentrated its supply can be. Almost all of the decline came through two redemption channels, one on each chain, and on BNB Chain US$200.00 million began at a single address. For a US$4 billion dollar token, that is a concentration its total does not reveal: a few holders can move its supply by close to a tenth within days.

Fig. 1

Ethereum and BNB Chain fell from October 7; Solana held flat

USD1 supply on each of its three main chains at each daily close, September 24 to October 15, 2026. Ethereum fell from US$1.61 billion to US$1.43 billion and BNB Chain from US$1.39 billion to US$1.19 billion; Solana stayed at US$1.42 billion.

ONCHAIN
BENCHMARK
USD1 SUPPLY, US$ DATE $1B $1B $1B $2B $2B Sep 24 Sep 26 Sep 28 Sep 30 Oct 2 Oct 4 Oct 6 Oct 8 Oct 10 Oct 12 Oct 14 $1.43B $1.42B $1.19B Ethereum Solana BNB Chain
Source: OCB · USD1 supply by chain at each daily close (00:00 UTC) · onchainbenchmark.comSep 24 – Oct 15, 2026
See USD1 →

Two chains, two redemption channels

From US$4.42 billion at the October 6 close, USD1's three-chain supply fell to US$4.04 billion at the October 15 close. Ethereum supply fell US$184.60 million (11.45 percent) through 63 redemptions, and BNB Chain US$200.43 million (14.40 percent) through 12. Every redemption was executed by the same USD1 issuance contract, which receives tokens and destroys them. On BNB Chain, US$200.00 million of the US$200.50 million sent for redemption started at a single address, which is not publicly labelled, and moved in round lots of US$30 million to US$50 million. On Ethereum, more than 99 percent came through a wallet labelled as BitGo, USD1's issuer and custodian, fed mostly by two deposit contracts. The chain shows where the tokens went, not who held them before; the redeeming holders and their reasons are not visible.

The tokens were redeemed, not moved to another network. Solana issued no new USD1 over the nine days. The token's smaller deployments, on networks including Tron, Aptos and Mantle, held about US$50 million and fell by US$0.35 million, all of it on Aptos. Transfers between Ethereum and BNB Chain totalled less than US$1 million. USD1 traded between US$0.998 and US$1.000 throughout.

USD1 on Ethereum, Oct 6 to Oct 15 close−11.45%US$1.61 billion → US$1.43 billion
USDe on Ethereum, same days−4.93%Ethena's synthetic dollar
USDC on Ethereum, same days−2.18%Circulating USDT −0.76%
RLUSD on Ethereum, same days+6.11%PYUSD +2.57%

Other dollar tokens on Ethereum did not fall as far. Over the same nine days, measured at the same blocks, USD1 on Ethereum fell 11.45 percent, against 4.93 percent for USDe, which shrank in the same crypto selloff, 2.18 percent for USDC and 0.76 percent for circulating USDT. PYUSD rose 2.57 percent and RLUSD 6.11 percent. A market-wide pullback explains some of the direction; it does not explain the size.

The three-way split ended on October 15

When USD1 was the one major stablecoin split almost evenly across three chains, on September 25, Ethereum held 36.62 percent of its three-chain supply, BNB Chain 31.83 percent and Solana 31.55 percent. At the October 15 close the order had changed: Ethereum 35.39 percent, Solana 35.07 percent and BNB Chain 29.54 percent. Ethereum's lead over Solana narrowed to US$12.92 million, and further Ethereum redemptions on October 16 left Solana fractionally the largest chain by that evening, UTC.

What to watch: the handover from BitGo

BitGo's latest published reserve report, for August 31, counted 4.20 billion USD1 outstanding, matched by US$4.20 billion of cash and government money-market fund shares. The October report, due in late November if it follows the August report's timing, will be the first to show the issuer's side of these redemptions. The peg held through them, and the tokens were destroyed through the issuer's own contract.

The next tests come with the change of issuer. When World Liberty's trust company opens, it will take on a token whose size depends on the decisions of a few large holders, under a charter whose legal footing is being argued in court. Whether fresh mints on Solana, or anywhere else, rebuild the total, or October marks the size USD1 carries into its new issuer, is the question the next weeks of supply data will answer.

USD1 supply change, October 6 to October 15 closeDirect onchain readGround-truth totalSupply

Three-chain USD1 supply was US$4,420.15M at the October 6 close and US$4,035.12M at the October 15 close: −US$385.03M (−8.71%). Ethereum −US$184.60M, BNB Chain −US$200.43M, Solana unchanged. Mints minus redemptions on each chain equal the supply change.

Verified Oct 16, 2026 · onchainbenchmark.com/instruments/usd1
Redemption pathDirect onchain readTransfer events to the issuance contract

On BNB Chain, US$200.00M of the US$200.50M sent to the USD1 issuance contract originated at one unlabelled address. On Ethereum, 99.9% arrived through a wallet labelled BitGo.

Verified Oct 16, 2026 · onchainbenchmark.com/instruments/usd1
Holders and motiveDisclosed limitNot identified

The report does not identify who redeemed or why. Redemptions pass through intermediary wallets, so the number of end holders cannot be read from the chain.

Disclosed Oct 16, 2026 · onchainbenchmark.com/methodology
MethodologyUSD1 supply is totalSupply() of the USD1 contract (0x8d0D…8B0d) on Ethereum and BNB Chain, and the supply of the USD1 mint on Solana, valued at US$1.00. Each daily close is the last block at or before 00:00 UTC on the following day (October 15 close: Ethereum block 26,201,364; BNB Chain block 127,878,732). Redemptions and issuance are Transfer events to and from the zero address between the October 6 and October 15 closes; they net to the supply change on each chain. Shares are of the three chains' combined supply, as in the September 25 report. USD1's smaller networks (Tron, Aptos, AB Core, Mantle and others), about US$50 million, are described but not charted; its Tempo and Canton deployments are not read. Peer changes are totalSupply() on Ethereum at the same blocks; USDT excludes Tether's treasury wallet. The reserve figures are from BitGo's USD1 Reserve Report for August 2026, examined by KPMG. Price is the hourly market price. Intraday figures for October 16 are from the same contracts after the close.
Questions & answers
How much did USD1 supply fall in October 2026?
USD1 supply fell US$385.03 million (8.71%) from the October 6 close to the October 15 close, to US$4.04 billion on Ethereum, BNB Chain and Solana.
Did USD1 lose its peg?
No. USD1 traded between US$0.998 and US$1.000 throughout the decline, and the redeemed tokens were destroyed through the issuer's own contract.
Did USD1 move to another blockchain?
No. The tokens were redeemed on Ethereum and BNB Chain, and no other network issued an offsetting amount. Solana supply was unchanged at US$1.42 billion.
Who will issue USD1?
BitGo issues and custodies USD1 today. World Liberty's trust company received conditional OCC approval in August 2026 and plans to take over issuance and custody.
Key facts
SubjectUSD1 (World Liberty Financial)
Supply, Oct 15 closeUS$4.04B ↗
Change, Oct 6 to Oct 15 close−US$385.03M (−8.71%)
More reports
Oct 15Stablecoins
USDe Outlasted the End of Its Incentives. It Shrank US$214.95 Million When Crypto Sold Off.
Oct 14Stablecoins
Four Weeks After Launch, Circle's Arc Holds 12% Less USDC Than on Day One
Oct 9Tokenized Treasuries
Holders Redeemed 13.56% of Spiko's Euro T-Bill Fund in Two Weeks, and the Outflow Has Not Stopped
Oct 7Stablecoins
Zand’s Dirham Stablecoin Grew 4.88-Fold in 19 Days, to US$274.01 Million; on Ethereum, 98.96% Sits in Five Undivided Blocks
Oct 5Stablecoins
Hyperliquid Now Holds 58% More USDC Than Coinbase's Own Chain, and Most of Its Yield Goes to Hyperliquid.
Understand the ratings
What is an RWA quality rating?
How a tokenized asset is rated
The methodology
The full four-dimension rubric
Go deeper
Every number in this report is live in the terminal.
Full quality rating, evidence trail, and per-deployment supply history.
Open USD1 in Terminal ↗
OCB — 03

More from Reports

All reports →
StablecoinsOct 15
USDe Outlasted the End of Its Incentives. It Shrank US$214.95 Million When Crypto Sold Off.
StablecoinsOct 14
Four Weeks After Launch, Circle's Arc Holds 12% Less USDC Than on Day One
Tokenized TreasuriesOct 9
Holders Redeemed 13.56% of Spiko's Euro T-Bill Fund in Two Weeks, and the Outflow Has Not Stopped
StablecoinsOct 7
Zand’s Dirham Stablecoin Grew 4.88-Fold in 19 Days, to US$274.01 Million; on Ethereum, 98.96% Sits in Five Undivided Blocks
StablecoinsOct 5
Hyperliquid Now Holds 58% More USDC Than Coinbase's Own Chain, and Most of Its Yield Goes to Hyperliquid.
StablecoinsOct 5
USDe Grew 20.5% in September. Its Token Incentives Ended on September 30.
OnChain Benchmark
HomeRatingsIndicesFlowsMethodologyReportsAboutEditorial policy
Independent · 2026

Subscribe to the Weekly Benchmark — what moved onchain this week, and what it means.

One email a week. Unsubscribe anytime.

Important disclosures

Nothing on this site or in the OnChain Benchmark service is investment, financial, legal, tax, or accounting advice, an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any security, token, or other instrument, or a recommendation, endorsement, or rating of suitability regarding any instrument, issuer, or transaction. Quality ratings, dimension scores, and index values are independent analytical opinions based on the data available to us at the time of computation; they are not statements of fact, guarantees of quality or safety, and not endorsements. Outputs are produced from public sources and third-party data and infrastructure outside our control — including RPC and node providers, indexers, oracle feeds, issuer attestations, auditor reports, and public regulatory filings — any of which may be delayed, unavailable, incomplete, incorrect, manipulated, or revised after the fact. Scores are computed periodically and may not reflect events occurring after the most recent computation. OnChain Benchmark does not warrant that any score, index, or evidence item is accurate, complete, reliable, current, or suitable for any purpose. You are solely responsible for any decision you make using the service, you should not rely on it as the sole basis for any investment, trading, custody, or counterparty decision, and you should conduct your own independent diligence and consult your own qualified professional advisors. To the maximum extent permitted by law, you assume all risk arising from your use of, or reliance on, the service. See our Terms of Service for the complete terms governing your use of the service.