ONCHAINBENCHMARKThe measurement standard for tokenized capital
RatingsIndicesMethodologyResearchReportsLog inOpen Terminal ↗
Reports/Stablecoins/~$2.08B
Stablecoins

Ripple's Dollar Crossed US$2 Billion — Most of It on Ethereum, Not the XRP Ledger

While the largest dollar tokens stood still, Ripple's RLUSD grew about 30% and crossed US$2 billion in supply on August 21 — the fastest of any major stablecoin. But four in five of those new dollars were minted on Ethereum, not the XRP Ledger the token is named for, tipping RLUSD to a first, slim Ethereum majority. And the supply sits in few hands: roughly 195 holders, with the top ten holding about 60% of the float.

Key findings
  • →Ripple's RLUSD grew about 30% — from US$1.60B to US$2.08B — and crossed US$2 billion in supply on August 21, 2026, the fastest of any major dollar stablecoin over the window while USDT and USDC held essentially flat (both −0.4%). see data →
  • →About 81% of the ~US$482M in net new supply was minted on Ethereum (+US$390M) rather than the XRP Ledger (+US$92M), tipping RLUSD to a slim Ethereum majority (~52% vs ~46%) for the first time after months of sitting XRPL-heavy. The token grew fastest on the chain it is not named for.
  • →The accumulation is concentrated and institutional in shape: at US$2 billion, RLUSD has roughly 195 measured holders, with the top ten holding about 60% of the tradable float. It is a balance-sheet build, not a retail spread — and a supply story, not a usage one, as RLUSD's transfer volume fell about a quarter in July.
OnChain Benchmark ResearchPublished · Aug 25, 2026, 09:03 PM UTCData current · Aug 25, 2026

Among the largest dollar tokens, almost nothing moved this month. USDT and USDC — together more than US$250 billion of supply — sat within a fraction of a percent of where they began. Against that stillness, one name ran: Ripple's RLUSD grew about 30%, from US$1.6 billion to US$2.1 billion, and crossed US$2 billion in supply on August 21. No other major stablecoin grew faster over the same weeks.

The growth did not follow the token's name. RLUSD is a creature of the XRP Ledger by identity, and for most of the summer that is where its supply lived. Yet of the roughly US$482 million minted into existence between late July and late August, about four in five dollars appeared on Ethereum. That was enough to push RLUSD past a threshold it had never crossed: for the first time, a little more than half of its supply sits on Ethereum rather than on the ledger it was built for.

RLUSD supply, Jul 24 → Aug 24+30%$1.60B → $2.08B; crossed $2B on Aug 21
Share of new supply on Ethereum~81%Ethereum +$390M vs XRP Ledger +$92M
Holders of the $2B supply~195Top ten hold about 60% of the float

The fastest grower while the giants stood still

Measured on the same window, the contrast is stark. RLUSD's roughly 30% gain compares with 7% for PayPal's PYUSD, under 2% for Ethena's USDe, and small declines for both USDC and USDT. This is a period in which the stablecoin market was debating the new federal rulebook and which tokens would clear it; the token that actually accumulated was a smaller, compliant-tier dollar, not one of the incumbents. Growth of this shape — one name pulling far ahead of a flat field — is the kind of divergence a market-cap ranking flattens into a single line.

Fig 1 — Stablecoin supply growth, Jul 24 – Aug 24, 2026

One name ran; the field stood still

Supply growth over the same window for the major dollar stablecoins above US$1 billion. RLUSD grew about 30% — several times faster than the next-fastest, and against flat-to-negative readings for the two giants. The comparison uses a matched window with both endpoints present for every token.

ONCHAIN
BENCHMARK
SUPPLY GROWTH, JUL 24 – AUG 24 (%) RLUSD PYUSD USDe USDC USDT -10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0%
Source: OCB per-instrument supply (all-chains aggregate) · onchainbenchmark.comas of Aug 24, 2026
See RLUSD coverage →

Named for one chain, minted on another

The sourced reasons for RLUSD's demand point at the XRP Ledger. In August, Ripple backed a credit fund that issues working-capital loans in RLUSD on the XRP Ledger, and in late July it launched Ripple Mint for institutional minting. Yet the supply landed elsewhere. Over the run, RLUSD on Ethereum rose from about US$699 million to US$1.09 billion — an increase of US$390 million — while its supply on the XRP Ledger rose only about US$92 million. One driver in the same window points the other way: a US$280 million lending pool that lets XRP holders borrow RLUSD on Ethereum. Whatever the mix of causes, the money followed the deeper pool of onchain dollar liquidity, which is on Ethereum.

Fig 2 — RLUSD supply, Ethereum vs XRP Ledger · Jul 24 – Aug 24, 2026

The lines cross late in the run

RLUSD supply on Ethereum (green) and the XRP Ledger (grey), in millions. The XRP Ledger led for most of the window; Ethereum overtook it only in the final days, as the surge to US$2 billion minted new supply almost entirely on Ethereum. The stock split is now roughly 52% Ethereum, 46% XRP Ledger — a narrow, recent majority, not a decisive one.

ONCHAIN
BENCHMARK
RLUSD SUPPLY ($M) DATE $600.00 $800.00 $1.00K $1.20K Jul 24 Jul 30 Aug 5 Aug 11 Aug 14 Aug 18 Aug 21 Aug 24 $1.09K $988.00 Ethereum XRP Ledger
Source: OCB per-chain supply (chain breakdown) · onchainbenchmark.comas of Aug 24, 2026
See RLUSD coverage →

The flip is real but fresh, and worth stating precisely. For most of the summer RLUSD sat XRPL-heavy — public trackers as recently as early August showed roughly US$877 million on the XRP Ledger against about US$643 million on Ethereum. Ethereum took a durable lead only in the final week of the run, and by a slim margin: about 52% of supply against 46% on the XRP Ledger. The direction is clear; the dominance is not. What changed decisively is not where RLUSD lives but where it grew.

A US$2 billion token in a few hundred hands

The other half of the picture is who holds it. At US$2 billion, RLUSD has roughly 195 measured holders across both chains, and the top ten of them hold about 60% of the tradable float. A stablecoin that clears US$2 billion on the strength of a few hundred addresses is not a retail-adoption story; it is an institutional balance-sheet build, the kind of position a treasury or a lending desk takes, sized in the tens or hundreds of millions. That reading fits the drivers — a credit fund, an institutional mint, a lending vault — better than the picture of a token spreading across many small wallets.

One caveat keeps the story honest: this is supply, not use. Even as RLUSD's balance grew, its transfer volume fell about a quarter in July. Dollars are being parked in RLUSD faster than they are being moved through it — accumulation ahead of activity. Whether the activity follows is the open question. If a compliant-tier dollar can gather US$2 billion onto Ethereum in a month, in institutional size, the next thing worth watching is whether those balances start to circulate — or whether they sit, a reserve waiting for a rulebook.

The growthPer-instrument supply (ground truth)Re-derived + reconciled

RLUSD supply rose from US$1.60B (Jul 24) to US$2.08B (Aug 24), +30.2% / ~US$482M net new, crossing US$2.0B on Aug 21. Measured on a matched window, no other major dollar stablecoin above US$1B grew faster: PYUSD +7.3%, USDe +1.7%, USDC −0.4%, USDT −0.4%. Figures are all-chains aggregate supply.

Verified Aug 25, 2026 · onchainbenchmark.com/instruments/rlusd
Where it mintedPer-chain breakdownBoth chains measured

Of the ~US$482M net new supply, Ethereum took +US$390M (US$699M → US$1.09B) and the XRP Ledger +US$92M (US$897M → US$988M) — about 81% of the growth on Ethereum. This tipped RLUSD from XRPL-majority to a slim Ethereum majority (~52% vs ~46%) in the final days of the run. No other chain holds a material balance.

Coverage notes · onchainbenchmark.com/methodology
Whole-truth frameWhat this is / is notExplicit

This is a supply-accumulation story, not a usage one: RLUSD's transfer volume fell ~25% in July even as its balance grew. Holder concentration (~195 holders; top ten ≈60% of float) is a measured input made legible, not a judgment of the issuer. The US$2B crossing (Aug 21) is our onchain read; public trackers, updated less often, still described RLUSD as approaching US$2B and XRPL-leaning.

Ripple RLUSD coverage · CoinDesk
MethodologySupply is the aggregate onchain supply of every RLUSD deployment, summed across the chains it is issued on and reconciled to independent market value. The chain split is the per-network breakdown of that same figure; growth is measured on a matched window with both endpoints present for each token compared. Holder concentration is the fund-wide top-ten share of the tradable float, across both chains, with protocol and infrastructure addresses excluded. Full methodology: onchainbenchmark.com/methodology.
Questions & answers
How much did RLUSD grow, and did it really cross US$2 billion?
RLUSD's supply grew about 30%, from roughly US$1.60 billion on July 24 to US$2.08 billion on August 24, 2026, crossing the US$2 billion mark on August 21 (our onchain read). Over the same window, no other major dollar stablecoin above US$1 billion grew faster: PYUSD rose about 7%, USDe under 2%, and both USDC and USDT edged down slightly.
Why does the report say RLUSD grew on Ethereum, not the XRP Ledger?
Of the roughly US$482 million of net new RLUSD supply, about 81% was minted on Ethereum (+US$390 million) versus about US$92 million on the XRP Ledger. That growth tipped RLUSD to a slim Ethereum majority — roughly 52% of supply on Ethereum against 46% on the XRP Ledger — for the first time, after it had sat XRPL-heavy for most of the summer. The dominance is narrow and recent; what changed decisively is where RLUSD grew, not where it lives.
Is RLUSD's US$2 billion widely held?
No. At US$2 billion, RLUSD has roughly 195 measured holders across both chains, and the top ten hold about 60% of the tradable float. That is the shape of an institutional balance-sheet position, not broad retail distribution. It is also a supply figure, not a usage one — RLUSD's transfer volume fell about a quarter in July even as its balance grew.
Key facts
RLUSD supply (Aug 24)~$2.08B
Growth, Jul 24 – Aug 24+30%
New supply on Ethereum~81%
Stock split (ETH / XRPL)~52% / 46%
Measured holders~195
MethodPer-chain supply ↗
More reports
Aug 25Tokenized Treasuries
The Entire Onchain US Treasury Rail Is US$15 Billion. The Stablecoin Backing the New Rules Would Push Out Is US$18 Billion.
Aug 21Tokenized Equities
You Can Buy 880 Tokenized Stocks Onchain. You Can Redeem 31 of Them at the Issuer.
Aug 21Stablecoins
The New Stablecoin Rulebook Would Exclude US$18 Billion in Backing. Nearly 1 in 5 Dollars Outside Tether.
Aug 19Stablecoins
Only 30% of the Stablecoin Market Discloses Its Reserves in Full. Here's What the Other US$200 Billion Actually Holds.
Aug 18Market Structure
The Largest Tokenized Treasury Fund Isn’t BlackRock’s Anymore — but Circle Didn’t Out-Raise It. It Out-Accumulated It.
Go deeper
Every number in this report is live in the terminal.
Full trust rating, evidence trail, and per-deployment supply history.
See RLUSD coverage ↗
OCB — 03

More from Reports

All reports →
Tokenized TreasuriesAug 25
The Entire Onchain US Treasury Rail Is US$15 Billion. The Stablecoin Backing the New Rules Would Push Out Is US$18 Billion.
Tokenized EquitiesAug 21
You Can Buy 880 Tokenized Stocks Onchain. You Can Redeem 31 of Them at the Issuer.
StablecoinsAug 21
The New Stablecoin Rulebook Would Exclude US$18 Billion in Backing. Nearly 1 in 5 Dollars Outside Tether.
StablecoinsAug 19
Only 30% of the Stablecoin Market Discloses Its Reserves in Full. Here's What the Other US$200 Billion Actually Holds.
Market StructureAug 18
The Largest Tokenized Treasury Fund Isn’t BlackRock’s Anymore — but Circle Didn’t Out-Raise It. It Out-Accumulated It.
Market StructureAug 14
Gold Rallied 7%. The Largest Regulated Tokenized Gold Got More Valuable — While Its Holders Were Redeeming.
OnChain Benchmark
HomeRatingsIndicesFlowsMethodologyReportsAboutEditorial policy
Independent · 2026

Subscribe to the Weekly Benchmark — what moved onchain this week, and what it means.

One email a week. Unsubscribe anytime.

Important disclosures

Nothing on this site or in the OnChain Benchmark service is investment, financial, legal, tax, or accounting advice, an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any security, token, or other instrument, or a recommendation, endorsement, or rating of suitability regarding any instrument, issuer, or transaction. Trust ratings, dimension scores, and index values are independent analytical opinions based on the data available to us at the time of computation; they are not statements of fact, guarantees of quality or safety, and not endorsements. Outputs are produced from public sources and third-party data and infrastructure outside our control — including RPC and node providers, indexers, oracle feeds, issuer attestations, auditor reports, and public regulatory filings — any of which may be delayed, unavailable, incomplete, incorrect, manipulated, or revised after the fact. Scores are computed periodically and may not reflect events occurring after the most recent computation. OnChain Benchmark does not warrant that any score, index, or evidence item is accurate, complete, reliable, current, or suitable for any purpose. You are solely responsible for any decision you make using the service, you should not rely on it as the sole basis for any investment, trading, custody, or counterparty decision, and you should conduct your own independent diligence and consult your own qualified professional advisors. To the maximum extent permitted by law, you assume all risk arising from your use of, or reliance on, the service. See our Terms of Service for the complete terms governing your use of the service.