ONCHAINBENCHMARKThe measurement standard for tokenized capital
IndicesDataRatingsMethodologyResearchReportsAboutLog inOpen Terminal ↗
Reports/Tokenized Treasuries/BUIDL
Tokenized TreasuriesEthereumAvalancheSolanaBNB ChainAptos

BlackRock's BUIDL Shrank 35% in 90 Days. A Holder of a Quarter of the Fund Left Entirely.

BUIDL, BlackRock's tokenized Treasury fund, is the asset most often cited as proof that institutions are moving onchain. Between August 9 and November 7 it fell from US$2.71 billion to US$1.76 billion. US$716.6 million of the fall was one holder, Grove, the Sky ecosystem's capital allocator, which held 26.5% of the fund in August and holds none of it now.

Key findings
  • →BlackRock's BUIDL fell 35.1% in 90 days, from US$2.71 billion on August 9 to US$1.76 billion on November 7, 2026. see data →
  • →Sky's allocator Grove held 26.5% of BUIDL on August 9 and none on November 8, 2026; its exit equals 75.5% of the fund's net decline.
  • →Without Grove, BUIDL fell 11.7% over the same period, as gains on BNB Chain and Aptos offset part of the declines on Ethereum, Avalanche and Solana.
  • →Grove also exited Janus Henderson's JTRSY, and its net borrowing from Sky fell US$1.18 billion between August 9 and November 8, 2026. see data →
OnChain Benchmark ResearchPublished · Nov 8, 2026, 07:30 AM UTCData current · Nov 8, 2026

Figures are as of the publication date. Current figures are on the record.

BUIDL, BlackRock's tokenized Treasury fund, lost 35.1% of its supply in 90 days, falling from US$2.71 billion on August 9 to US$1.76 billion on November 7. One holder, Grove, which held a quarter of the fund in August, left it entirely; its exit equals 75.5% of the net decline.

BUIDL supply, all chains−35.1%US$2,708.2M on Aug 9 to US$1,758.4M on Nov 7
Grove's share of the fund, Aug 926.5%716.63M BUIDL-I shares; none on Nov 8
BUIDL excluding Grove−11.7%US$1,991.6M to US$1,758.4M

One allocator held a quarter of BlackRock's tokenized fund

Grove is the capital allocator of the Sky stablecoin protocol, formerly MakerDAO. It invests the protocol's funds in tokenized credit and Treasury products, and Sky's governance rulebook lists the Ethereum contract it holds them through, its ALM Proxy. On August 9 that contract held 716.63 million shares of BUIDL-I, the fund's I share class, out of 964.40 million in issue. Across all eight chains BUIDL has US$1.00 shares, so Grove alone was 26.5% of the fund.

Between August 9 and November 7, Grove sent 719.74 million BUIDL-I shares in 24 transfers to the address from which BUIDL-I is burned. The shares were its own: since September 2025 every BUIDL-I share the contract received was minted to it, and its earlier shares came from Spark, another Sky allocator, not from the market. On November 8 it held none. BUIDL-I fell to 144.04 million shares, and BUIDL on Ethereum, both classes together, fell from US$1,189.3 million to US$316.7 million. BUIDL more than halved on Ethereum in September; Grove redeemed US$500.0 million of that month's US$520.1 million fall.

Fig 1 — Who held BUIDL · Aug 9 and Nov 7, 2026

BUIDL supply by holder, all chains

Grove's US$716.6M slice of BUIDL on Aug 9 was gone by Nov 7; all other holders fell from US$1,991.6M to US$1,758.4M.

ONCHAIN
BENCHMARK
BUIDL SHARES, US$ $0 $1B $2B $3B Aug 9, 2026 Nov 7, 2026 $2.7B $1.8B Grove (Sky) All other holders
Source: OnChain Benchmark onchain reads, eight chains; Grove balance by archive read, Ethereum · onchainbenchmark.comAug 9 and Nov 7, 2026 · Grove balance at 00:00 UTC
Live series →

Without Grove, BUIDL fell 11.7% and moved across chains

The rest of the fund shrank less and shifted between networks. Holders other than Grove held US$1,991.6 million on August 9 and US$1,758.4 million on November 7. BUIDL on BNB Chain rose from US$110.8 million to US$277.4 million and on Aptos from US$16.2 million to US$157.4 million. On Avalanche it fell from US$631.3 million to US$416.7 million, continuing a decline from July that Crypto Briefing, citing research, attributed partly to redemptions, and on Solana from US$712.2 million to US$540.6 million. The fund was larger in between: it reached US$2,815.2 million on September 5, while Grove's redemptions were under way.

Grove left Janus Henderson's Treasury fund too, and most of the cash went back to Sky

Over the same period Grove redeemed all 769.83 million of its JTRSY shares, 98.2% of Janus Henderson's tokenized Treasury fund on Ethereum. JTRSY on Ethereum fell from 783.77 million shares to 42.08 million, and its versions on other chains did not absorb the difference: they hold fewer than 10 million shares between them.

Most of the redemption cash went back to Sky. Grove's ALM Proxy received US$719.4 million of USDC from one address, matching its BUIDL redemptions, and US$835.4 million from the JTRSY fund's escrow. It converted US$2,006.4 million of USDC through Sky's LitePSM into USDS and sent it to its Sky allocator buffer, which returned US$674.0 million. The debt of Grove's ALLOCATOR-BLOOM-A vault, the Sky credit line behind Grove's general allocation activity, fell from US$2,798.2 million on August 9 to US$1,491.9 million on November 8. Grove's second vault, ALLOCATOR-GROVE-A, grew by US$129.0 million, so its net borrowing from Sky fell by US$1,177.3 million, against US$1,554.7 million of redemption proceeds. Cash is interchangeable inside Grove, so the rest cannot be traced dollar for dollar; Grove also sent USDC to other destinations in the period, including US$313.0 million through Circle's cross-chain transfer protocol.

Grove did not leave tokenized credit. Its own figures for the third quarter, published by Alea Research, show its allocations falling from US$2.66 billion to US$1.82 billion as its BUIDL and JTRSY positions shrank, while its holding in a fund of AAA-rated CLOs was about flat, at US$389.5 million and then US$393.7 million, and a Galaxy warehouse facility and Morpho vaults grew. Neither Sky nor Grove has said why it left the Treasury funds. The pattern is a smaller balance sheet that kept its credit exposure and cut its T-bills.

Why it matters

BUIDL's size has been read as a measure of institutional adoption. On August 9 a quarter of it was one allocator funded by a stablecoin protocol's balance sheet, and when that allocator redeemed, the fund lost that quarter. The holders that remain are less concentrated on Ethereum, with BNB Chain and Aptos adding US$307.8 million between them while BUIDL on Ethereum fell 73.4%.

The episode also shows where part of tokenized Treasury demand comes from. Grove's position in BUIDL was funded by borrowing from Sky, so its size depended on Sky's allocation decisions as well as on BlackRock's fund. The open question is whether BUIDL can replace a single protocol's capital with a broader base of holders, or whether its size will keep tracking the decisions of a few onchain balance sheets.

BUIDL −35.1%, all chainsDirect onchain readDaily supply, eight chains

US$2,708.2M on Aug 9 and US$1,758.4M on Nov 7, 2026. Per chain, Aug 9 → Nov 7: Ethereum 1,189.3 → 316.7; Solana 712.2 → 540.6; Avalanche 631.3 → 416.7; BNB Chain 110.8 → 277.4; OP Mainnet 26.3 → 26.6; Aptos 16.2 → 157.4; Polygon 13.5 → 10.5; Arbitrum 8.5 → 12.6 (US$M, US$1.00 shares).

OnChain Benchmark · BUIDL
Grove's 26.5% and its exitDirect onchain readbalanceOf and totalSupply, Ethereum

At block 25,713,690 (Aug 9 00:00 UTC): BUIDL-I (0x6a9d…9041) totalSupply 964.40M, Grove ALM Proxy (0x491E…3A44E) 716.63M; BUIDL (0x7712…2AEc) 224.91M. At block 26,366,424 (Nov 8 00:00 UTC): BUIDL-I 144.04M, Grove 0; BUIDL 172.64M. Grove sent 719.74M BUIDL-I in 24 transfers to 0x8780…4200, from which BUIDL-I is burned, Aug 9 to Nov 7.

Etherscan · Grove ALM Proxy
The holder is GroveGovernance recordSky Atlas A.6.1.1.2

Sky's Atlas lists 0x491EDFB0B8b608044e227225C715981a30F3A44E as Grove's ALM Proxy (Mainnet) contract, and names ALLOCATOR-BLOOM-A (buffer 0x629a…b1Cd, vault 0x2651…5d43) and ALLOCATOR-GROVE-A as Grove's two allocator vaults.

Sky Atlas · A.6.1.1.2 Grove
JTRSYDirect onchain readbalanceOf and totalSupply

JTRSY (0x8c21…4b86) on Ethereum: totalSupply 783.77M at block 25,713,690, Grove 769.83M; 42.08M and Grove 0 at block 26,366,424. Current totalSupply on Base 4.47M, Monad 4.08M, Avalanche 0, Plume about 0.5M.

OnChain Benchmark · JTRSY
Cash returned to SkyDirect onchain readTransfers and Vat debt

Aug 9 to Nov 8: Grove received USDC 719.4M from 0xcfc0…ab33 and 835.4M from JTRSY PoolEscrow 0x0665…4be3; sent USDC 2,006.4M to Sky LitePSM USDC A, converted DAI to USDS via DaiUsds, and sent 2,006.4M USDS to ALLOCATOR_BLOOM_A_BUFFER (674.0M returned). Debt in Sky's Vat at blocks 25,713,690 and 26,366,424: ALLOCATOR-BLOOM-A 2,798.2M to 1,491.9M; ALLOCATOR-GROVE-A 1.0M to 130.0M (net −1,177.3M, including stability fees accrued). Grove also sent USDC 313.0M to Circle's CCTP TokenMinter in the period.

Sky chainlog
Grove's other allocationsIssuer-sourced figures via third partyGrove data, Jun 30 to Sep 30

Alea Research (Oct 29, 2026), from Grove's own data: allocations US$2.66B to US$1.82B; BUIDL 714.0M to 119.3M; JTRSY 853.0M to 309.5M; JAAA 389.5M to 393.7M; Galaxy warehouse facility 0 to 377.1M; Morpho vaults 205.7M to 334.1M.

Alea Research · Centrifuge fees per dollar
What this report does not showDisclosed limitScope

No reason for Grove's exit is claimed; no statement from Sky, Grove, BlackRock or Janus Henderson was found. The party behind 0xcfc0…ab33 is not identified beyond paying the USDC. Holders other than Grove are not attributed. No claim is made about tokenized Treasury funds as a whole.

OnChain Benchmark methodology
MethodologyBUIDL supply is the daily totalSupply of each of its eight deployments (Ethereum counts both the BUIDL and BUIDL-I contracts) at US$1.00 per share, summed by day. Grove's holdings and the Ethereum and Avalanche supplies at August 9 and November 8 are balanceOf and totalSupply calls at the first block on or after 00:00 UTC. Grove's debt to Sky is the vault's normalised debt multiplied by the rate accumulator in Sky's Vat at the stated blocks. JTRSY is valued at its published share price; share counts are reported where the price would change the comparison.
Questions & answers
How much did BlackRock's BUIDL shrink between August and November 2026?
Across its eight chains BUIDL fell from US$2,708.2 million on August 9 to US$1,758.4 million on November 7, 2026, down US$949.8 million or 35.1%.
Who redeemed BUIDL?
The largest redeemer was Grove, the Sky ecosystem's capital allocator. Its ALM Proxy held 716.63 million BUIDL-I shares on August 9, 26.5% of the fund, and none on November 8. That accounts for 75.5% of the decline.
Where did the money go?
Most of it went back to Sky. Grove converted US$2,006.4 million of USDC into USDS through Sky's LitePSM and sent it to its Sky allocator buffer. Its net borrowing from Sky fell US$1,177.3 million between August 9 and November 8, against US$1,554.7 million of redemption proceeds.
Did the rest of BUIDL shrink too?
Yes, by less. Excluding Grove, BUIDL fell 11.7%, from US$1,991.6 million to US$1,758.4 million, with growth on BNB Chain and Aptos offset by declines on Avalanche and Solana.
Key facts
InstrumentBUIDL ↗
IssuerBlackRock (tokenized by Securitize)
Supply, Aug 9 → Nov 7US$2,708.2M → US$1,758.4M
Grove's BUIDL-I, Aug 9 → Nov 8716.63M → 0
Grove net borrowing from Sky, Aug 9 → Nov 8−US$1,177.3M
More reports
Oct 31Stablecoins
An Estimated US$6.3 Billion Stolen, US$2.8 Billion Frozen: Why the Binance Hacker Still Holds US$1.2 Billion in Ether
Oct 30Stablecoins
Four Hours, 20 Freezes, One Attacker: Inside the Race to Freeze the Binance Hack, Second by Second
Oct 27Tokenized Equities
Two in Three Addresses Holding Solana's Largest Tokenized-Stock Line Hold Less Than a Dollar
Oct 20Tokenized Treasuries
Spiko's Euro T-Bill Fund Is 30% Smaller. The Accounts Behind Most of Its Arbitrum Redemptions Now Hold Spiko's Amundi Fund.
Oct 19Stablecoins
OKX's X Layer Has Lost US$471 Million of USDG Since September as Burns Outpace Minting
Understand the ratings
What is an RWA quality rating?
How a tokenized asset is rated
The methodology
The full four-dimension rubric
Go deeper
The current ratings behind this report are in the terminal.
Full quality rating, evidence trail, and per-deployment supply history.
Open BUIDL ↗
OnChain Benchmark — 03

More from Reports

All reports →
StablecoinsOct 31
An Estimated US$6.3 Billion Stolen, US$2.8 Billion Frozen: Why the Binance Hacker Still Holds US$1.2 Billion in Ether
StablecoinsOct 30
Four Hours, 20 Freezes, One Attacker: Inside the Race to Freeze the Binance Hack, Second by Second
Tokenized EquitiesOct 27
Two in Three Addresses Holding Solana's Largest Tokenized-Stock Line Hold Less Than a Dollar
Tokenized TreasuriesOct 20
Spiko's Euro T-Bill Fund Is 30% Smaller. The Accounts Behind Most of Its Arbitrum Redemptions Now Hold Spiko's Amundi Fund.
StablecoinsOct 19
OKX's X Layer Has Lost US$471 Million of USDG Since September as Burns Outpace Minting
StablecoinsOct 16
USD1 Shrank US$385.0 Million in Nine Days as World Liberty Prepares to Take Over Its Issuance
OnChain Benchmark
HomeRatingsIndicesFlowsMethodologyReportsAboutEditorial policy
Independent · 2026

Subscribe to the Weekly Benchmark — what moved onchain this week, and what it means.

One email a week. Unsubscribe anytime.

Important disclosures

Nothing on this site or in the OnChain Benchmark service is investment, financial, legal, tax, or accounting advice, an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any security, token, or other instrument, or a recommendation, endorsement, or rating of suitability regarding any instrument, issuer, or transaction. Quality ratings, dimension scores, and index values are independent analytical opinions based on the data available to us at the time of computation; they are not statements of fact, guarantees of quality or safety, and not endorsements. Outputs are produced from public sources and third-party data and infrastructure outside our control — including RPC and node providers, indexers, oracle feeds, issuer attestations, auditor reports, and public regulatory filings — any of which may be delayed, unavailable, incomplete, incorrect, manipulated, or revised after the fact. Scores are computed periodically and may not reflect events occurring after the most recent computation. OnChain Benchmark does not warrant that any score, index, or evidence item is accurate, complete, reliable, current, or suitable for any purpose. You are solely responsible for any decision you make using the service, you should not rely on it as the sole basis for any investment, trading, custody, or counterparty decision, and you should conduct your own independent diligence and consult your own qualified professional advisors. To the maximum extent permitted by law, you assume all risk arising from your use of, or reliance on, the service. See our Terms of Service for the complete terms governing your use of the service.